A challenging and polemical argument about the Autonomia movement in Italy, a group of Italian intellectuals who produced a powerful and rigorous critique of capitalism and work in the 1960s and '70s, and its intersections with two of the most radical architectural-urban theorists of the day: Aldo Rossi and Archizoom. The Project of Autonomy introduces English-speaking readers ...
A challenging and polemical argument about the Autonomia movement in Italy, a group of Italian intellectuals who produced a powerful and rigorous critique of capitalism and work in the 1960s and '70s, and its intersections with two of the most radical architectural-urban theorists of the day: Aldo Rossi and Archizoom. The Project of Autonomy introduces English-speaking readers to major figures like Mario Tronti and Raniero Panzieri who have previously been little known here, especially in an architectural context; and draws on significant new source material, including recent interviews by the author and untranslated material. Finally, the book includes beautiful illustrations related to the context of these intellectual and architectural movements, with reproductions of rare publications of the 1960s as well as seminal projects and exhibitions. A part of the FORuM Project Publication series published in association with the Temple Hoyne Buell Center for the Study of American Architecture at Columbia University.
原文摘录
· · · · · ·
If ideology coincided with the blind belief in progress, with faith in the evolution of society for the better, theory, as Tronti quoted from Paul Klee, was sichtbar machen - making visible, that is, the construction of a clear analytical and political point of view based on the solid ground of concrete conceptual categories. (查看原文)
1 有用 Sugar Lady 2018-09-06 21:54:02
Aureli的勇气挺鼓舞人的，无可为而为之的精神棒极了。读关于Rossi的分析，三点：1. Rossi的自主性与美国的那些强调学科自主是不一样的，2 Rossi与Tafuli之间的自主性，一个积极介入，一个消极批判，前者希望有一个political subject的状态存在于资本主义中，3 A的思考和写作似乎就是想要扛起意大利知识分子历史责任。 P63论述Rossi的Locus蕴含的separat... Aureli的勇气挺鼓舞人的，无可为而为之的精神棒极了。读关于Rossi的分析，三点：1. Rossi的自主性与美国的那些强调学科自主是不一样的，2 Rossi与Tafuli之间的自主性，一个积极介入，一个消极批判，前者希望有一个political subject的状态存在于资本主义中，3 A的思考和写作似乎就是想要扛起意大利知识分子历史责任。 P63论述Rossi的Locus蕴含的separateness in terms of political reading完全就是Aureli在那本后来absolute form书中的理论逻辑基础。 (展开)
1 有用 过客 2020-07-11 12:08:14
可以说是absolute architecture的前传，需要相当的知识背景作为铺垫，稍有些重复和松散。不过尾章的Aureli的对于Theory和Project的动情表白，有些动人的左派悲壮式的勇敢和气概，有种“士不可以不弘毅，任重而道远”的笃定。 这点上讲Eisenman在autonomy的追求上走了岔路（或者另一条路）。我想这也是为什么Aureli在Absolute Architecture... 可以说是absolute architecture的前传，需要相当的知识背景作为铺垫，稍有些重复和松散。不过尾章的Aureli的对于Theory和Project的动情表白，有些动人的左派悲壮式的勇敢和气概，有种“士不可以不弘毅，任重而道远”的笃定。 这点上讲Eisenman在autonomy的追求上走了岔路（或者另一条路）。我想这也是为什么Aureli在Absolute Architecture中以O.M Ungers和OMA的project作为收尾。 (展开)
0 有用 沈涵 2017-09-17 12:09:03
开篇不错
0 有用 Moly！ 2015-08-20 19:22:41
开篇autonomy\rationality\capitalism的关系感觉眼前一亮，中间讲到operismo的种种人还是有写云里雾里 直到讲到rossi与archizoom又渐入佳境
0 有用 嗯哼 2020-04-14 00:24:23
建筑理论真的不适合纯文字的表达方式，一篇essay就够了，别动不动就写书