Neoliberals hate the state. Or do they? In the first intellectual history of neoliberal globalism, Quinn Slobodian follows a group of thinkers from the ashes of the Habsburg Empire to the creation of the World Trade Organization to show that neoliberalism emerged less to shrink government and abolish regulations than to redeploy them at a global level.
Slobodian begins in Austria in the 1920s. Empires were dissolving and nationalism, socialism, and democratic self-determination threatened the stability of the global capitalist system. In response, Austrian intellectuals called for a new way of organizing the world. But they and their successors in academia and government, from such famous economists as Friedrich Hayek and Ludwig von Mises to influential but lesser-known figures such as Wilhelm Röpke and Michael Heilperin, did not propose a regime of laissez-faire. Rather they used states and global institutions—the League of Nations, the European Court of Justice, the World Trade Organization, and international investment law—to insulate the markets against sovereign states, political change, and turbulent democratic demands for greater equality and social justice.
Far from discarding the regulatory state, neoliberals wanted to harness it to their grand project of protecting capitalism on a global scale. It was a project, Slobodian shows, that changed the world, but that was also undermined time and again by the inequality, relentless change, and social injustice that accompanied it.
0 有用 ChristineWelt 2025-04-16 13:55:36 美国
历史细节太多扣一星,但总体上是了解全球主义者的目的,行为逻辑和为什么如今备受责怪的必读之作。总结来看有几个亮点:1.美国没有过意图加入WTO;2.neoliberal与其说是经济学家不如说是一群法学家,主要任务是保护使得资源自由流动的制度环境;3.真正的自由主义经济学家如哈耶克,并不赞成neoliberal的任务,反而认同市场不可知论,由于市场不可知,那么制度去保障市场稳定也成为无稽之谈;4.全球... 历史细节太多扣一星,但总体上是了解全球主义者的目的,行为逻辑和为什么如今备受责怪的必读之作。总结来看有几个亮点:1.美国没有过意图加入WTO;2.neoliberal与其说是经济学家不如说是一群法学家,主要任务是保护使得资源自由流动的制度环境;3.真正的自由主义经济学家如哈耶克,并不赞成neoliberal的任务,反而认同市场不可知论,由于市场不可知,那么制度去保障市场稳定也成为无稽之谈;4.全球主义和国家边界有根本矛盾,这在rodrik的hyperglobalization里专门叙述过;5.neoliberal设计的世界体系由内生脆弱性,因为它没有考虑到体系的参与者有打破体系、违抗自由流动的权利和激励,尤其是在分配不公问题愈加明显的当下。 (展开)