Between the early 1950s and the accelerated demolition and construction of Beijing's “old city” in preparation for the 2008 Olympics, the residents of Dashalar—one of the capital city's poorest neighborhoods and only a stone's throw from Tian’anmen Square—lived in dilapidated conditions without sanitation. Few had stable employment. Today, most of Dashalar's original inhabitants have been relocated, displaced by gentrification. In Beijing from Below Harriet Evans captures the last gasps of subaltern life in Dashalar. Drawing on oral histories that reveal memories and experiences of several neighborhood families, she reflects on the relationships between individual, family, neighborhood, and the state; poverty and precarity; gender politics and ethical living; and resistance to and accommodation of party-state authority. Evans contends that residents' assertion of belonging to their neighborhood signifies not a nostalgic clinging to the past, but a rejection of their marginalization and a desire for recognition. Foregrounding the experiences of the last of Dashalar's older denizens as key to understanding Beijing's recent history, Evans complicates official narratives of China's economic success while raising crucial questions about the place of the subaltern in history.
0 有用 Sisyphebel 2026-04-11 04:18:01 美国
口述的故事本身都很有意思 但是嘗試larger frame 和intervention 反而做得就比較一般了. 太刻意了. 其實
4 有用 RoderickFranco 2025-09-24 14:02:39 北京
3.5. 还原“庶民声音”作为一种对抗。这种还原是把双刃剑吧。一方面主观视角和场景被完整的呈现给了观众,分析性的口吻放在每一章的结尾。很容易沉浸空间和情绪中,而不会被理论介入突然拽出来。有好几个故事都差点看哭。另一方面,距离太近似乎似乎也使得整本书太过于一家之言了。marginized和privileged很多时候都是混杂在一起的,新的开发和旧的生活也绝非完全二元对立的。虽然追求所谓的“客观中立”... 3.5. 还原“庶民声音”作为一种对抗。这种还原是把双刃剑吧。一方面主观视角和场景被完整的呈现给了观众,分析性的口吻放在每一章的结尾。很容易沉浸空间和情绪中,而不会被理论介入突然拽出来。有好几个故事都差点看哭。另一方面,距离太近似乎似乎也使得整本书太过于一家之言了。marginized和privileged很多时候都是混杂在一起的,新的开发和旧的生活也绝非完全二元对立的。虽然追求所谓的“客观中立”并非人类学需要的职责,但也许能够比现在站的再远一点点,让更多相关方的声音流淌进来会让这本书更关乎共识而非权力。毕竟,用偏见的叙事对抗偏见的叙事在我看来并不能达到“正反合”的效果,只会让大家各执一词。 (展开)
0 有用 🥺 2026-01-10 00:55:40 北京
非常新奇的阅读体验。可能因为之前完全没读过,加上这个主题我空间上很熟悉,时间上很陌生,所以阅读过程中画面感极强。可能因为我看的机翻(洋文水平还是不足以读原著),我觉得分析的部分中规中矩,但是口述史的部分真的写的很好,可读性很强,且涉及面向广,对于改开北京史研究而言有很大的参考、补充意义,搭配我最近看的《贫嘴张大民的幸福生活》体感更佳,也许后续研究会涉及到这里的某一类群体。
3 有用 狗子 2023-09-18 11:25:40 中国香港
边看边哭
2 有用 Accélération 2025-08-03 19:12:37 四川
intro,写真好,还看见了认识的名字😂