Introduction
Part One: Structure, Conjuncture, Encounter
1 The Many Readings and Misreadings of Althusser
1.1 The polemic against theoreticist structuralism
1.2 Althusser as the repetition of communist orthodoxy
1.3 Althusser’s work as rupture of the dialectic of theory and practice
1.4 The possibility of another reading
2 Althusser and Hegel: The Never-ending Confrontation
2.1 The 1947 Thesis
2.2 The polemics against French Hegelianism
2.3 The Critique of Hegel
3 ‘This man is indeed alone in facing his task’: Althusser on Montesquieu
3.1 Montesquieu’s revolution in method
3.2 Montesquieu’s politics
3.3 Montesquieu as anti-teleology
4 Structure Revisited
4.1 ‘Althusser of the structure’ vs. ‘Althusser of the conjuncture’?
4.2 High Althusserianism revisited
4.3 Structures without structuralism?
4.4 Althusser’s self-criticism: From structures to enduring relations
4.5 The critique of Feuerbach as critique of Phenomenology and Structuralism
4.6 From structure to the conjuncture
5 Materialism as Philosophy of the Encounter
5.1 An Althusserian Kehre?
5.2 Rethinking the genealogy of the encounter
5.3 The encounter as anti-teleology and as new practice of politics
6 From the Critique of Natural Law to the Void of the Forest and the Inexistence of the Origin: Althusser on Rousseau
6.1 The 1956 course
6.2 The 1958–59 course
6.3 The 1965–66 course
6.4 The 1972 course
6.5 A comparison between the three courses
7 From the ‘Hidden God’ to the Materialism of the Encounter: Althusser and Pascal
7.1 Althusser in captivity and Pascal
7.2 Lucien Goldmann and the ‘Hidden God’
7.3 From the materiality of ideological practices to aleatory materialism
8 The Difficulties of Being a Materialist in Philosophy: Assessing Aleatory Materialism
8.1 The genealogy of aleatory materialism
8.2 A philosophy of the encounter
8.3 Pierre Raymond on aleatory materialism
8.4 Contradictions of aleatory materialism
8.5 Contingent encounter or materialist dialectic?
9 Spinoza in Althusser-as-Laboratory
9.1 Spinozist epistemology
9.2 Spinoza and singularity
9.3 Spinoza and the rejection of classical theories of knowledge
9.4. Spinoza in the genealogy of the materialism of the encounter
10 Structure and/as Conjuncture
10.1 Rethinking singularity
10.2 Contradiction and antagonism
10.3 Specific historicities
10.4 The dialectic of structure and conjuncture and the recurring necessity of philosophical interventions
Part Two: A New Practice of Philosophy
11 Althusser’s Struggle with the Definition of Philosophy
11.1 The aporiasb of theoretical practice
11.2 The politics of the epistemological break
11.3 Philosophical self-criticism
11.4 Philosophy and/as politics
11.5 The spontaneous philosophy of the scientists
11.6 Philosophy as class struggle
12 Philosophy as Laboratory
12.1 Redrawing the line of demarcation with idealism
12.2 The margin and the encounter
12.3 Philosophy and ideology
12.4 Different practices of philosophy
12.5 Philosophy and abstraction
12.6 Practice revisited
12.7 Philosophy and practice
12.8 How can anybody be a philosopher?
13 A Philosopher Always Catches a Moving Train
13.1 The return of philosophical metaphors
13.2 The new practice of philosophy revisited
13.3 Portrait of a materialist philosopher
14 Althusser and Gramsci on Philosophy
14.1 Gramsci and the philosophy of praxis
14.2 Althusser and Gramsci: a missed encounter?
14.3 The open question of Marxist philosophy
Part Three: Is There an Althusserian Politics?
5 Althusser 1960–65: Attempting a Theoretical Correction of a Political Strategy in Crisis
15.1 Althusser’s political engagement
15.2 The politics of the 1960–65 texts
15.3 The debate on ‘student problems’
16 The Politics of Theoretical Anti-Humanism
16.1 Theoretical anti-humanism as a theoretical and political strategy
16.2 Marx’s Sixth Thesis revisited
16.3 The combination of historicism and humanism as the main danger
16.4 The debate at Argenteuil
16.5 The Humanist Controversy revisited
16.6 Theoretical anti-humanism in the 1970s
17 Althusser’s Self-Criticism
17.1 1966: The turning point
17.2 Althusser on the Cultural Revolution
17.3 May 1968 and the new challenges
17.4 On the Reproduction of Capitalism as a political statement
17.5 Balibar and the new practice of politics
17.6 The left-wing criticism of Stalinism
18 Althusser in the 1970s: Break and Open Criticism of Communist Reformism
18.1 The French debate and the abandonment of the dictatorship of the proletariat
18.2 Althusser’s confrontation with the crisis of the communist movement
18.3 Facing the crisis of the Party
18.4 The confrontation with the crisis of Marxism
18.5 Marx in his Limits
18.6 Traces of communism
18.7 The debate on the state
18.8 Confronting Gramsci
19 The Politics of the Encounter: Machiavelli and Beyond
19.1 The first confrontation
19.2 The founder of a theory without precedent
19.3 Thinking under the conjuncture
19.4 A philosophical reading of Machiavelli
19.5 The encounter and the New Prince
19.6 Throwing the dice: Machiavelli in the 1980s texts
19.7 Althusser’s solitude
19.8 A Convergence for Liberation: Althusser in the 1980s
19.9 How to organise good encounters?
20 How to Make Lasting Encounters: Althusser and Political Subjectivity
20.1 The subject as problem and not answer
20.2 The return of the subject?
20.3 A non-subjectivist theory of subjectivity
20.4 Political organisations and collectivities as knowledge processes and forms of collective intellectuality
21 The Limits of Althusserian Politics
Conclusion
References
Index
· · · · · · (
收起)
2 有用 タヌキ 2024-05-14 03:44:42 湖南
没必要将基本上是片段式摘抄的读书笔记集结成书出版
1 有用 龟龟 2023-12-31 21:30:17 上海
在占有材料的丰富程度和论述的广度上应该是现今第一的阿尔都塞研究了。不过还是有不少口水话和复读的,感觉完全可以写得更精简一些,但也有不少洞见。比如让我注意到了阿尔都塞的卢梭讲稿,这个文本对理解后期他的思想可以说是至关重要的。最后作者也指出了阿派政治的困境,他最终还是局限于一种高涨的群众运动/危机中的政党的模式化的二元对立,没有看到新自由主义下群众运动本身陷入的分裂和危机。另外他对政党自我改革的呼吁也... 在占有材料的丰富程度和论述的广度上应该是现今第一的阿尔都塞研究了。不过还是有不少口水话和复读的,感觉完全可以写得更精简一些,但也有不少洞见。比如让我注意到了阿尔都塞的卢梭讲稿,这个文本对理解后期他的思想可以说是至关重要的。最后作者也指出了阿派政治的困境,他最终还是局限于一种高涨的群众运动/危机中的政党的模式化的二元对立,没有看到新自由主义下群众运动本身陷入的分裂和危机。另外他对政党自我改革的呼吁也是比较抽象的,始终无法设想更加具体的具有替代性和解放性的政治-组织形式和党群互动形式,身份的限制最终阻碍了他的视野。正是在这个意义上,作者指出的葛兰西思想具有的补充借鉴作用(“作为实验室的政党”)我认为是中肯的,他在某些层面上比阿尔都塞更深入地思考了实践。 (展开)
2 有用 路觉🐋 2023-03-31 20:55:26 广东
阿尔都塞的思想是马列主义的变体,并且是高尚而破裂的变体。