出版社: Thames & Hudson Ltd
副标题: 50th Anniversary edition
出版年: 2021-1
页数: 112
定价: GBP 9.99
装帧: Hardcover
ISBN: 9780500023846
内容简介 · · · · · ·
Linda Nochlin’s seminal essay on women artists is widely acknowledged as the first real attempt at a feminist history of art. Nochlin refused to handle the question of why there had been no ‘great women artists’ on its own, corrupted, terms. Instead, she dismantled the very concept of ‘greatness’, unravelling the basic assumptions that had centred a male-coded ‘genius’ in the s...
Linda Nochlin’s seminal essay on women artists is widely acknowledged as the first real attempt at a feminist history of art. Nochlin refused to handle the question of why there had been no ‘great women artists’ on its own, corrupted, terms. Instead, she dismantled the very concept of ‘greatness’, unravelling the basic assumptions that had centred a male-coded ‘genius’ in the study of art. With unparalleled insight and startling wit, Nochlin laid bare the acceptance of a white male viewpoint as not merely a moral failure, but an intellectual one. Freedom, as she sees it, requires women to risk entirely demolishing the art world’s institutions, and rebuilding them anew – in other words, to leap into the unknown.
In this stand-alone anniversary edition, Nochlin’s essay is published alongside its reappraisal, ‘Thirty Years After’. Written in an era of thriving feminist theory, as well as queer theory, race and postcolonial studies, ‘Thirty Years After’ is a striking reflection on the emergence of a whole new canon. With reference to Joan Mitchell,
Louise Bourgeois, Cindy Sherman and many more, Nochlin diagnoses the state of women and art with unmatched precision and verve. ‘Why Have There Been
No Great Women Artists?’ has become a slogan and rallying cry that resonates across culture and society; Dior even adopted it in their 2018 collections. In the 2020s, at a time when ‘certain patriarchal values are making a comeback’, Nochlin’s message could not be more urgent: as she herself put it in 2015, ‘there is still a long way to go’.
作者简介 · · · · · ·
Linda Nochlin (1931–2017), described in the Guardian as ‘a trailblazer to the end’, was Lila Acheson Wallace Professor Emerita of Modern Art at the New York University Institute of the Fine Arts. She wrote extensively on issues of gender in art history and on 19thcentury Realism. Her numerous publications include Women, Art and Power; Representing Women; Courbet and Misère.
目录 · · · · · ·
1.Why Have There Been No Great Women Artists?
2.“Why Have There Been No Great Women Artists?” Thirty Years After
Notes
Further Reading
1.Why Have There Been No Great Women Artists?
2.“Why Have There Been No Great Women Artists?” Thirty Years After
Notes
Further Reading
· · · · · · (收起)
喜欢读"Why Have There Been No Great Women Artists?"的人也喜欢 · · · · · ·
Why Have There Been No Great Women Artists?的书评 · · · · · · ( 全部 20 条 )
如何回答尖锐的伪命题
是什么制约了女性成为伟大的艺术家?
这篇书评可能有关键情节透露
很少有一篇文章能够彻底改变并颠覆一门史学研究,但这篇《为什么没有伟大的女性艺术家》却凭借一己之力,直接颠覆了艺术史研究中关于“为何没有伟大女性艺术家”的话题研究。 艺术史学家的琳达·诺克林在这篇1970年代发表于权威艺术杂志上的论文中犀利地指出:“艺术史关于历史... (展开)没有伟大的女艺术家,是因为培养伟大艺术家的土壤没有为女性开放
问题背后才是思考起点|2024年3月23日 D1
为什么没有伟大的女艺术家?
女性艺术史还有很长的路要走
这篇书评可能有关键情节透露
这是一篇预示女性主义艺术史开端的著名论文,发表于上个世纪七十年代。作者琳达·诺克林犀利地指出这是个钓鱼的伪问题,以颠倒的逻辑将我们面临的问题构想为‘妇女问题’。问题根本不可能被完全解决,只能够对现状本质重新解释。伟大的艺术这个设想本身幼稚、歪曲和不加鉴别。 ... (展开)> 更多书评 20篇
论坛 · · · · · ·
在这本书的论坛里发言这本书的其他版本 · · · · · · ( 全部3 )
-
广西师范大学出版社 (2023)8.3分 446人读过
-
中国人民大学出版社 (2004)8.3分 130人读过
以下书单推荐 · · · · · · ( 全部 )
- 方所十周年选书:我随星辰的滚动而前行 (广州方所)
- 成为女性 (高铁牛是你霸霸)
- 女性主义(书) (submarine)
- 女作者写女性主义艺术研究和女艺术家 (树)
- 女权主义 (Momo)
谁读这本书? · · · · · ·
二手市场
· · · · · ·
- 在豆瓣转让 有130人想读,手里有一本闲着?
订阅关于Why Have There Been No Great Women Artists?的评论:
feed: rss 2.0
1 有用 开花的扁桃树 2023-06-29 19:47:02 德国
由1970年的Why have there been no great women artists?一文和三十年后的同名回顾文章组成。这个问题是在问为什么女性的艺术创作与男性不同。作者驳斥了艺术天才论,认为问题在于institution和education,就相当于在问为什么艺术家大多出身于Bourgeois而不是贵族阶级。 作者探讨了不同艺术表现形式之间的区别。相比于小说家,女性画家受到性别不平... 由1970年的Why have there been no great women artists?一文和三十年后的同名回顾文章组成。这个问题是在问为什么女性的艺术创作与男性不同。作者驳斥了艺术天才论,认为问题在于institution和education,就相当于在问为什么艺术家大多出身于Bourgeois而不是贵族阶级。 作者探讨了不同艺术表现形式之间的区别。相比于小说家,女性画家受到性别不平等的压迫会更加严重,因为绘画更加professional。但从事任何艺术创作的女性都面临either career or marriage的抉择。(Emily Mary Osborn 的 Nameless and Friendless想起《双姝奇缘》的“卖画”片段!) (展开)
0 有用 下酒詩 2024-01-25 00:48:47 广东
幾年前讀的(醍醐灌頂)!
0 有用 没有色彩的章鱼 2023-07-04 18:39:22 北京
还行吧,从论文的角度来说比较浅。"Women artists, women art historians, and women critics have made a difference, then, over the past thirty years. We have -- as a community, working together -- changed the discourse a... 还行吧,从论文的角度来说比较浅。"Women artists, women art historians, and women critics have made a difference, then, over the past thirty years. We have -- as a community, working together -- changed the discourse and the production of our field. Things are not the same as they were in 1971 for women artists and the people who write about them." (100) (展开)
0 有用 Momo 2023-07-23 22:53:05 浙江
从内容和行文都很有年代感。
0 有用 Neocaulisaurus 2024-06-14 09:51:42 黑龙江
3.5 虽然书名有意图的指向某个凝固的答案。但,作者将女性划为同谋者,以相当现实的主体式论辩逆转了问题的性质。正如黑人问题为什么不改名叫白人问题,(性别问题也改个名吧-父权dickheads的问题)。同时诺克林前置了结构性的宗教社会因素,反讽的道出女性无法改变其地位这永久事实,呼唤女性走出受害者的阴霾,拒绝那些悬置历史单单把“why have there been no great women a... 3.5 虽然书名有意图的指向某个凝固的答案。但,作者将女性划为同谋者,以相当现实的主体式论辩逆转了问题的性质。正如黑人问题为什么不改名叫白人问题,(性别问题也改个名吧-父权dickheads的问题)。同时诺克林前置了结构性的宗教社会因素,反讽的道出女性无法改变其地位这永久事实,呼唤女性走出受害者的阴霾,拒绝那些悬置历史单单把“why have there been no great women artists”归结于智性问题的白男话语,be like他们在19世纪惯用的圣徒传记一样。 (展开)
0 有用 海绵宝宝迷魂记 2024-08-31 22:40:44 山西
两篇论文,一为70年代的经典疑问:Why Have There Been No Great Women Artists?我们并非缺少天资,而失去了接触此、向上生长的机会,不禁想到伍尔夫《Three Guineas》。而时隔30年后,女权理论及实践的不断发展,仍在提醒着斗争女性,革命尚未成功。
0 有用 树 2024-08-25 17:11:50 上海
编排得很好的小书,收录了Linda Nochlin 1970年和2006年的两篇文章,加一篇2021年的intro,从编排感受到feminism art history的传承和活力。1970从无到有、平地起高楼,审视父权语境对greatness的定义;06年的读出了后现代主义、post-greatness下的新机遇和新挑战,比如女性&公共空间和纪念碑、男性气概的阶段性反冲。继续“make trou... 编排得很好的小书,收录了Linda Nochlin 1970年和2006年的两篇文章,加一篇2021年的intro,从编排感受到feminism art history的传承和活力。1970从无到有、平地起高楼,审视父权语境对greatness的定义;06年的读出了后现代主义、post-greatness下的新机遇和新挑战,比如女性&公共空间和纪念碑、男性气概的阶段性反冲。继续“make trouble, to call into question, to ruffle feathers in the patriarchal dovecotes”。还想夸夸最后的延伸阅读书单,超有用、超贴心! (展开)
0 有用 Neocaulisaurus 2024-06-14 09:51:42 黑龙江
3.5 虽然书名有意图的指向某个凝固的答案。但,作者将女性划为同谋者,以相当现实的主体式论辩逆转了问题的性质。正如黑人问题为什么不改名叫白人问题,(性别问题也改个名吧-父权dickheads的问题)。同时诺克林前置了结构性的宗教社会因素,反讽的道出女性无法改变其地位这永久事实,呼唤女性走出受害者的阴霾,拒绝那些悬置历史单单把“why have there been no great women a... 3.5 虽然书名有意图的指向某个凝固的答案。但,作者将女性划为同谋者,以相当现实的主体式论辩逆转了问题的性质。正如黑人问题为什么不改名叫白人问题,(性别问题也改个名吧-父权dickheads的问题)。同时诺克林前置了结构性的宗教社会因素,反讽的道出女性无法改变其地位这永久事实,呼唤女性走出受害者的阴霾,拒绝那些悬置历史单单把“why have there been no great women artists”归结于智性问题的白男话语,be like他们在19世纪惯用的圣徒传记一样。 (展开)
3 有用 盐少女 2024-06-13 12:24:05 北京
In a word, there have been no great women artists is not because that women are lack of so-called “talent”, but because that they are not allowed to be great. So, stop questioning yourself. Question t... In a word, there have been no great women artists is not because that women are lack of so-called “talent”, but because that they are not allowed to be great. So, stop questioning yourself. Question the society, question the institution, and most importantly, question the patriarchy. (展开)
0 有用 下酒詩 2024-01-25 00:48:47 广东
幾年前讀的(醍醐灌頂)!