Winners and Losers challenges conventional wisdom about how American citizens form opinions on international trade. While dominant explanations in economics emphasize personal self-interest—and whether individuals gain or lose financially as a result of trade—this book takes a psychological approach, demonstrating how people view the complex world of international trade through the lens of interpersonal relations.
Drawing on psychological theories of preference formation as well as original surveys and experiments, Diana Mutz finds that in contrast to the economic view of trade as cooperation for mutual benefit, many Americans view trade as a competition between the United States and other countries—a contest of us versus them. These people favor trade as long as they see Americans as the “winners” in these interactions, viewing trade as a way to establish dominance over foreign competitors. For others, trade is a means of maintaining more peaceful relations between countries. Just as individuals may exchange gifts to cement relationships, international trade is a tie that binds nations together in trust and cooperation.
Winners and Losers reveals how people’s orientations toward in-groups and out-groups play a central role in influencing how they think about trade with foreign countries, and shows how a better understanding of the psychological underpinnings of public opinion can lead to lasting economic and societal benefits.
"This landmark book is the most compelling and comprehensive challenge available to the prevailing economic interpretations of where American preferences about foreign trade come from. Winners and Losers is a tour de force."—Richard K. Herrmann, coeditor of Ending the Cold War: Interpretations, Causation, and the Study of International Relations
"Persuasive. Mutz draws on a wide range of novel survey data and experiments to offer what is perhaps the broadest and most original account of how public attitudes about trade are based on psychological factors rather than calculations of economic self-interest."—John Sides, coauthor of Identity Crisis: The 2016 Presidential Campaign and the Battle for the Meaning of America
1 有用 普林斯顿读书汇 2022-11-18 12:21:13 北京
非常有趣的一本书。讨论了美国公众为何不支持自由贸易——尽管它会带来确凿的福利改善。虽然经济学中的主流解释强调个人私利——以及个人是否因贸易而获利或亏损——但这本书采用了心理学方法,展示了人们如何通过人际关系的视角看待复杂的国际贸易世界。 简单来说,相当一部分美国人将跨国贸易视为零和博弈,只有当美国是跨国贸易中的“赢家”时,他们才会支持贸易。而另一些人觉得,贸易就像交朋友,贸易的对象必须“值得”。这... 非常有趣的一本书。讨论了美国公众为何不支持自由贸易——尽管它会带来确凿的福利改善。虽然经济学中的主流解释强调个人私利——以及个人是否因贸易而获利或亏损——但这本书采用了心理学方法,展示了人们如何通过人际关系的视角看待复杂的国际贸易世界。 简单来说,相当一部分美国人将跨国贸易视为零和博弈,只有当美国是跨国贸易中的“赢家”时,他们才会支持贸易。而另一些人觉得,贸易就像交朋友,贸易的对象必须“值得”。这本书揭示了人们对内群体和外群体的划分如何影响他们看待与外国的贸易,并表明了更好地理解公众舆论的心理基础可以带来的持久的经济和社会效益。 (展开)