The dark side of the gig economy (Uber, Airbnb, etc.) and how to make it equitable for the users and workers most exploited.
When the “sharing economy” launched a decade ago, proponents claimed that it would transform the experience of work—giving earners flexibility, autonomy, and a decent income. It was touted as a cure for social isolation and rampant ecological degradation. But this novel form of work soon sprouted a dark side: exploited Uber drivers, neighborhoods ruined by Airbnb, racial discrimination, and rising carbon emissions. Several of the most prominent platforms are now faced with existential crises as they prioritize growth over fairness and long-term viability.
Nevertheless, the basic model—a peer-to-peer structure augmented by digital tech—holds the potential to meet its original promises. Based on nearly a decade of pioneering research, After the Gig dives into what went wrong with this contemporary reimagining of labor. The book examines multiple types of data from thirteen cases to identify the unique features and potential of sharing platforms that prior research has failed to pinpoint. Juliet B. Schor presents a compelling argument that we can engineer a reboot: through regulatory reforms and cooperative platforms owned and controlled by users, an equitable and truly shared economy is still possible.
0 有用 醒着但还在装睡 2025-03-21 02:29:43 广东
比较有收获的是作者将分享者分为依赖收入型和补充收入型,前者基本依靠体力劳动,后者可以依靠资产。这种情况可能会拉大原有的收入分配不平等。以及平台中的链条效应和逐底竞争使得原来为中产和富人提供的服务变得更便宜了,这会不会减弱了涓滴效应呢?还是有很多可以继续探讨的东西。
0 有用 纪恩同学 2025-02-26 11:57:29 江苏
Although the platform economy can generate jobs requiring different skill levels, statistics suggest that most platform jobs are in labor-intensive services in China.
0 有用 ✧ 2021-06-22 12:57:35
看了下concluding chapter——platform/digital co-op代替firm;算法为了工人不再是capital;数据透明化;市政规则保护市场。作者社会学与经济学视角不谈技术的,感觉呼声有点乐观。对creative labor还是competition无解。(for Lolo‘s thesis)
0 有用 小小米啦啦啦 2024-05-29 08:40:21 福建
图书馆借的一本英文书,讲零工经济带来的利弊,基于一些数据得出的结论。不依赖于平台满足基本生活的劳动者会有更大的自由,规避更多层面的风险以及有更高的生活满意度。
1 有用 麟舟 2025-02-28 02:26:42 美国
可说是西方世界从社会学角度做平台的集大成者了。西方世界绝大多数平台研究的内容与视角都不超出这本和范戴克等的The Platform Society(Alexandrea Ravenelle的Hustle and Gig对宏观经济社会背景的挖掘更深入点)。中文学界充满了扎实的民族志,但没有这样的综合性作品。