1. Writing is the Economist's Trade
Rotten writing causes more papers and reports to fail than do rotten statistics or rotten research. You have to be read to be listened to. Bad writing is not read, even by professors or bosses paid to read it....the hard business of economic thinking is getting the WORDS STRAIGHT.
WRITING FORCES THE WRITER TO THINK. An economically trained person is likely to spend most of her working life writing papers, reports, memoranda, proposals, columns, and letters.
2.Writing is Thinking
Now the influence of mere style is greater than you think. The history of ideas has many wide turns caused by "mere" lucidity and elegance of expression. Poincre's good French and Einstein's good German early in this century were no small contributors to their influence on math... (查看原文)
4. Be Thou Clear; But for lord's Sake Have Fun, Too
"Therefore one ought to take care to write not merely so that the reader can understand but so that he CANNOT possibly MISUNDERSTAND." Clarity is a social matter, not something to be decided unilaterally by the writer. The reader like the consumer is sovereign.
If the reader thinks what you write is unclear, THEN IT IS, by DEFINTION.
Clarity is a matter of speed directed at the point.
But one you learn a few of the rules and start applying them you'll start to be able to play the Game of Writing. It's not just grim following of rules, a death march to the Department of English. It's great fun to get a sentence just right, in the same way that it's fun to get a dish you're cooking just right or double play in softball just right.
Flo... (查看原文)
"That's not writing, that's typing." Deirdre attributed this quote to Hemingway, which is inaccurate. Truman Capote said it. [Click here]. But the real problem is the premise that you can split content from style. It's wrong. Content and style are yolk and ...
(展开)
0 有用 渐渐忘了耶 2023-01-01 15:09:39 江苏
这本书至少对我而言是大有裨益的!但可惜读晚了,早读个十几年应该会不太一样。我的英语水平怎么都算突出,毕竟都出过书了,但是上学时候,却怎么也写不好英语论文。(虽然不是英专,但因为学校特点,我们都要求用英语写论文。)早读到这本书,应该会有相当大的改进的。
0 有用 Castle-Z 2022-10-20 10:30:34 陕西
前半部分值的研究
0 有用 dessner🌻 2022-07-30 12:27:25
烂书,建议直接读原版或者对照阅读。
1 有用 春江烂尾鱼 2022-06-06 14:44:35
老师当年推荐了本书英文版,我只简单翻过一下,没有认真读。这个中文译本翻译得非常认真、细致,许多译注都恰到好处,也体现了译者的用心。本书虽然在很多具体案例上都举了英文写作的例子,并假定读者具有拉丁文和希腊罗马修辞课程的背景,很多内容和原理与中文写作也是相通的,例如少用连词和副词,让文章自然贯通;设定适当的读者形象和叙述者形象,并始终保持;不必强行运用古体修辞——在中文语境下就是不要强行写自己不擅长的... 老师当年推荐了本书英文版,我只简单翻过一下,没有认真读。这个中文译本翻译得非常认真、细致,许多译注都恰到好处,也体现了译者的用心。本书虽然在很多具体案例上都举了英文写作的例子,并假定读者具有拉丁文和希腊罗马修辞课程的背景,很多内容和原理与中文写作也是相通的,例如少用连词和副词,让文章自然贯通;设定适当的读者形象和叙述者形象,并始终保持;不必强行运用古体修辞——在中文语境下就是不要强行写自己不擅长的文白夹杂;避免啰嗦,减少不必要的观点陈述和缺乏论证的严厉批评等等。 (展开)
0 有用 五花王 2022-11-06 21:01:12 北京
虽然主旨是关于英文学术写作,原标题是《经济学写作》,但对绝大多数非虚构和应用文体来说,基本原理都是共通的。论起来,也没什么绝密窍门,多读多写多贴出来让人骂。
0 有用 y 2023-03-15 15:48:43 浙江
Be clear. 英式写作的精粹。
0 有用 蛋壳烧书 2023-03-09 22:13:09 广东
这是一本西方教学的写作书,对中文教学可以借鉴,但很多不适用,因为英语的写作教学和中文的写作教学还是有区别的。当时看目录挺不错的,但因为是英语写作教学,读完后有些失落。如果用英语来写作的人,倒是可以读一读这本书。
0 有用 王禹丹 2023-01-25 11:35:57 北京
前半部分对中文写作也很有启发。
0 有用 渐渐忘了耶 2023-01-01 15:09:39 江苏
这本书至少对我而言是大有裨益的!但可惜读晚了,早读个十几年应该会不太一样。我的英语水平怎么都算突出,毕竟都出过书了,但是上学时候,却怎么也写不好英语论文。(虽然不是英专,但因为学校特点,我们都要求用英语写论文。)早读到这本书,应该会有相当大的改进的。
0 有用 九爷 2022-11-18 11:05:30 吉林
翻译得非常到位,获益匪浅