With the progress of artificial intelligence, the digitalization of the lifeworld, and the reduction of the mind to neuronal processes, the human being increasingly appears to be just a product of data and algorithms. That is, we conceive ourselves "in the image of our machines", and
conversely, we elevate our machines and our brains to new subjects. At the same time, demands for an enhancement of human nature culminate in transhumanist visions of taking human evolution to a new stage.
Against this self-reification of the human being, this book defends a humanism of embodiment: our corporeality, vitality, embodied freedom are the foundations of a self-determined existence, which uses these new technologies only as a means, instead of letting them rule us.
In Defence of the Human Being offers an array of interventions directed against a reductionist naturalism or transhumanism in various areas of science and society. As alternative it offers an embodied and enactive account of the human person: we are neither pure minds nor brains, but primarily
embodied, living beings in relation with others. Fuchs applied this concept to issues such as artificial intelligence, transhumanism and enhancement, virtual reality, neuroscience, embodied freedom, psychiatry, and finally to the accelerating dynamics of current society which lead to an increasing
disembodiment of our everyday conduct of life.
Cutting across neuroscience, philosophy, and psychiatry, this important new book applies cutting-edge concepts of embodiment and enactivism to the current scientific, technological and cultural tendencies that will crucially influence our society's development in the 21st century.
0 有用 . 2024-01-02 14:24:59 上海
不够过瘾啊
0 有用 海旁橄榄树 2025-12-16 07:27:42 美国
挑了几章看,但是越来越不能说服我。有点像critique of everything except人类中心主义。 立论基础仍然是人是irreducible,但是科技与物是reducible且通常以可分可约的形态function。所以科技不能完全模仿人类blabla。尤其是说痛苦与二进制不同的那段,有点给我整笑了,不太理解为什么这么对比。 这个对科技的理解只是现代科学的立柱与重要方法之一。然而现实是... 挑了几章看,但是越来越不能说服我。有点像critique of everything except人类中心主义。 立论基础仍然是人是irreducible,但是科技与物是reducible且通常以可分可约的形态function。所以科技不能完全模仿人类blabla。尤其是说痛苦与二进制不同的那段,有点给我整笑了,不太理解为什么这么对比。 这个对科技的理解只是现代科学的立柱与重要方法之一。然而现实是,我们虽然活在一个看似被现代科学方法统治的世界,其实并不是这样。因而书里这样的对话模式有点正中科技决定论主义者下怀 (展开)