David Graeber was not only one of today’s most important living thinkers, but also one of the most influential. He was also one of the very few engaged intellectuals who has a proven track record of effective militancy on a world scale, and his impact on the international left cannot be overstated.
Graeber has offered up perhaps the most credible path for exiting capitalism—as much through his writing about debt, bureaucracy, or “bullshit jobs” as through his crucial involvement in the Occupy Wall Street movement, which led to his more-or-less involuntary exile from the American academy. In short, Anarchy—In a Manner of Speaking presents a series of interviews with a first-rate intellectual, a veritable modern hero on the order of Julian Assange, Edward Snowden, Linus Torvald, Aaron Swartz, and Elon Musk.
Interviewers Mehdi Belhaj Kacem and Assia Turquier-Zauberman asked Graeber not only about the history of anarchy, but also about its contemporary relevance and future. Their conversation also explores the ties between anthropology and anarchism, and the traces of its DNA in the Occupy Wall Street and Yellow Vest movements. Finally, Graeber discussed the meaning of anarchist ethics—not only in the political realm, but also in terms of art, love, sexuality, and more. With astonishing humor, verve, and erudition, this book redefines the contours of what could be (in the words of Peter Kropotkin) “anarchist morality” today.
1 有用 1537639 2025-12-26 04:05:58 广东
开篇吐槽马克思主义知识分子的学术官僚化,安人的分歧更多在实践而非理论层。对现代国家的三个特征定义很精准,聊到人类学的过去与未来、欲望的幻象和匮乏理论、涌现理论、神经科学、宣泄美学,诸多新颖思想的交织已使人应接不暇,这难道不是一本从政治理念到哲学思想都已经彻底无政府化的书吗?比起在一本著作内某个独裁的作家一言堂,对话录形式必然是更安那其的。 “自由的本质是对他人下承诺的能力”,也只有格雷伯才有能力给... 开篇吐槽马克思主义知识分子的学术官僚化,安人的分歧更多在实践而非理论层。对现代国家的三个特征定义很精准,聊到人类学的过去与未来、欲望的幻象和匮乏理论、涌现理论、神经科学、宣泄美学,诸多新颖思想的交织已使人应接不暇,这难道不是一本从政治理念到哲学思想都已经彻底无政府化的书吗?比起在一本著作内某个独裁的作家一言堂,对话录形式必然是更安那其的。 “自由的本质是对他人下承诺的能力”,也只有格雷伯才有能力给出如此简明的定义,承诺意味着给出一种无先验条件的信任,也是对他者的无条件信任,也意味着随时背叛的可能性,准确刻画出自主行动(有理由地行动)和自动行动的区别。没有这种谎言的悖论,“社会性”是不可能的,政治更无从谈起。 (展开)
0 有用 tardyhobbes 2024-10-14 18:24:56 日本
This struck me as a wonderful way to describe what writers do when they do it well, and as a much more interesting understanding of the kind of transmission it is: they remind you of something you alr... This struck me as a wonderful way to describe what writers do when they do it well, and as a much more interesting understanding of the kind of transmission it is: they remind you of something you already know. (展开)
0 有用 OcéaneHe 2024-06-29 17:05:48 北京
好