Acknowledgements
List of Tables, Maps and Figures
Introduction
1Ethnogenesis in the Near Frontier
2The Administration of the Empire
3The Organization of the Book
1 Mapping Out the Mongolian Identities
1The Center-Periphery Model
2The Frontier Space of Inner Mongolia
3The Feudal Tradition of Mongols
4The Mongolian Banners
5The Mongol-Manchu Alliance
6The Incorporation of Mongols into the Qing State
7The Exceptional Case of Hulun Buir
8Empires and Cross-Identifications
2 Land Reform and State Centralization
1A Natural Erosion of Nomadic Feudalism
2The Late Qing Land Reform
3The Changing Utility of Land in fangken
4Colonization or Political Consolidation?
5The Nexuses of Ruling Powers
6The Puzzle of Mongolian Cooperation
3 Revolution, Warlordism and Ethnic Confrontation
1The Revolutionary Turbulence
2Mongolian Reactions to the Revolution
3Intrusion of Provincial Governments
4Emerging Local Conflicts
5The Age of Warlordism
6Transforming the Frontier Governance Structure
7Military Colonization
4 Ethnicizing Boundaries in the Legal Jurisdiction
1Legal Pluralism under the Imperial Rule
2The Motley Jurisdictions in Eastern Inner Mongolia
3Navigating the Disparate Legal Spaces
4Reshuffling the Mongolian Legal Jurisdiction
5The End of Legal Pluralism?
5 The Mongolian Shift in Hulun Buir
1Tribal Soldiers in a Mobile Garrison System
2Territorializing the Governments in Hulun Buir
3Territorial Administration in Hulun Buir
4Becoming Mongols
5Striving for Mongolian Autonomy
6The Intellectual Construct
7Territorialization and Ethno-Genesis
Conclusion
Appendix 1: Administrative Experiences of the Frontier Military Officials, 1900–1916
Appendix 2: Administrative Experiences of the Frontier Military Officials, 1917–1928
Glossary of Terms
Bibliography
Index
· · · · · · (
收起)
1 有用 本杰明·海瑟薇 2025-09-28 02:01:11 美国
題目很有新意,但讀起來實在感到落差太大。理論上僅從Lattimore的邊疆定義爲基礎展開對話,而完全沒有Turner的frontier或者Adelman的borderland 參與進來,不得不讓人懷疑作者在邊疆理論方面是否有足夠的了解。其中特別對於清末民初的蒙疆轉變尤其單薄,不僅沒有展開北洋政府的蒙疆經略手段,甚至連奉直兩派的衝突都沒有講清楚,遑論日俄兩國在蒙疆滲透殖民的歷史(第三章的Milita... 題目很有新意,但讀起來實在感到落差太大。理論上僅從Lattimore的邊疆定義爲基礎展開對話,而完全沒有Turner的frontier或者Adelman的borderland 參與進來,不得不讓人懷疑作者在邊疆理論方面是否有足夠的了解。其中特別對於清末民初的蒙疆轉變尤其單薄,不僅沒有展開北洋政府的蒙疆經略手段,甚至連奉直兩派的衝突都沒有講清楚,遑論日俄兩國在蒙疆滲透殖民的歷史(第三章的Military Colonization 一節甚至感到文不對題,欺騙感情)。 總之,理論框架薄弱,史料蒐集不夠全面,有些浪費這個題目,,, (展开)