Introduction
1. The call for a language of public health: Philanthropic foundations, bacteriologists, and health administrators
2. The language and dialect of health science: Public health schools and their statistical practices
3. The language of health administrations: The League of Nations Epidemiological Intelligence Service
4. The language of policy-making: Research and advocacy through health demonstrations
5. Popularization at a global scale: The WHO and the postwar health statistics reporting system
· · · · · ·
(
更多)
Introduction
1. The call for a language of public health: Philanthropic foundations, bacteriologists, and health administrators
2. The language and dialect of health science: Public health schools and their statistical practices
3. The language of health administrations: The League of Nations Epidemiological Intelligence Service
4. The language of policy-making: Research and advocacy through health demonstrations
5. Popularization at a global scale: The WHO and the postwar health statistics reporting system
6. The art of rhetoric: Statistical standards at work, from fieldwork to world policy-making
7. Another way of speaking? Public health statistics in the People's Republic of China
Conclusion: Numbers, experts, and policy-making
· · · · · · (
收起)
2 有用 sanbilly 2024-05-25 18:52:06 北京
当年在洛克菲勒档案馆查档的时候,碰到过作者。虽然主题不同,但整体的思路跟我的书稿有类似的地方,都是强调全球-在地网络。一些人物和机构也有重合。不过她的时段更长,我基本上不会详细讨论49年之后在两岸的发展。此外她对国际层面的着眼更多。是比较合适的对话对象。
1 有用 Sisyphebel 2023-07-27 14:02:28 浙江
還是不錯的. 前面LNHO以及各國統計專家和民國時期的互動分析比較到位. 史料也很扎實(大概這就是日內瓦大學讀博士得天獨厚的優勢吧)。但是prc那章過於泛泛,可能是有疫情的影響(也許)吧。算是有對Ghosh的書有補充,但是實在過於簡單。prc1949年後衛生系統和延安時期是否有區別,或者說prc怎麼用statistics(統計)來規劃政策其實講得並不是很清楚。 只說prc重視統計這個結論其實有些寬... 還是不錯的. 前面LNHO以及各國統計專家和民國時期的互動分析比較到位. 史料也很扎實(大概這就是日內瓦大學讀博士得天獨厚的優勢吧)。但是prc那章過於泛泛,可能是有疫情的影響(也許)吧。算是有對Ghosh的書有補充,但是實在過於簡單。prc1949年後衛生系統和延安時期是否有區別,或者說prc怎麼用statistics(統計)來規劃政策其實講得並不是很清楚。 只說prc重視統計這個結論其實有些寬泛。以及prc一章的斷代到了wg也和書的副標題有一些差異。 結論點題COVID和economization of life以及公共衛生大數據,有很好現實考量. (展开)
0 有用 红色主义飞碟 2025-02-18 11:05:48 美国
比我下面还干