A groundbreaking examination of austerity’s dark intellectual origins.
For more than a century, governments facing financial crisis have resorted to the economic policies of austerity—cuts to wages, fiscal spending, and public benefits—as a path to solvency. While these policies have been successful in appeasing creditors, they’ve had devastating effects on social and economic welfare in countries all over the world. Today, as austerity remains a favored policy among troubled states, an important question remains: What if solvency was never really the goal?
In The Capital Order, political economist Clara E. Mattei explores the intellectual origins of austerity to uncover its originating motives: the protection of capital—and indeed capitalism—in times of social upheaval from below.
Mattei traces modern austerity to its origins in interwar Britain and Italy, revealing how the threat of working-class power in the years after World War I animated a set of top-down economic policies that elevated owners, smothered workers, and imposed a rigid economic hierarchy across their societies. Where these policies “succeeded,” relatively speaking, was in their enrichment of certain parties, including employers and foreign-trade interests, who accumulated power and capital at the expense of labor. Here, Mattei argues, is where the true value of austerity can be observed: its insulation of entrenched privilege and its elimination of all alternatives to capitalism.
Drawing on newly uncovered archival material from Britain and Italy, much of it translated for the first time, The Capital Order offers a damning and essential new account of the rise of austerity—and of modern economics—at the levers of contemporary political power.
0 有用 Sea son 2025-04-24 05:21:21 美国
还蛮不错的!英国和意大利历史比较,两国政治气候完全不一样为什么在一战后都诉诸于austerity,从class dimension解释austerity是怎么被作为一个depoliticizing的工具来实现并加强法西斯政权的。唯一不满的点恰恰是这个比较,意大利有labor movements但是英国完全没有,这个比较就很不对等。反而觉得比较德国和意大利更有意思,两个都有工人运动,意大利墨索里尼用... 还蛮不错的!英国和意大利历史比较,两国政治气候完全不一样为什么在一战后都诉诸于austerity,从class dimension解释austerity是怎么被作为一个depoliticizing的工具来实现并加强法西斯政权的。唯一不满的点恰恰是这个比较,意大利有labor movements但是英国完全没有,这个比较就很不对等。反而觉得比较德国和意大利更有意思,两个都有工人运动,意大利墨索里尼用的austerity实现wage repression,但希特勒直接大屠杀工人,同时许诺日耳曼民族一个welfare state(而不是austerity!)。好奇意大利为什么没演变成德国?比较英国我大胆猜测的是为了满足美国胃口…叹气 (展开)
0 有用 周北冥 2025-10-07 06:48:54 美国
Austerity最重要的目的不在于纯“经济”方面,而在于巩固资本主义社会阶级关系(私有财产和劳资关系),牺牲工人利益保值资本,剥夺群众政治筹码,维护资本主义制度。从李嘉图的工资铁律走到这一步,资本主义也真是“与时俱进”啊。