王昌伟，新加坡国立大学中文系教授，2004年获得哈佛大学博士学位，师从著名学者包弼德教授，主要从事宋明思想文化的研究。曾出版专著《中国历史上的关中士人：907-1911》，英译《历史上的理学》（包弼德著）等；在Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies、T’oung Pao、Journal of Chinese Overseas、Ming Studies、Journal of Sung-Yuan Studies、《汉学研究》《清华学报》等发表中英文专题论文30余篇。
Such factionalism was actually much more complicated, however. The north-south divide that arose from the episodes surrounding the civil service examination and the formation of political cliques can be properly understood only if we keep in mind the three layers of the divide outlined in the introduction the actual differences in ecological, economic, administrative and social conditions; the differences between northern and southern literati in their intellectual orientation and views of the state; and the perceived or imagined north-south divide and how it has been used historically to interpret political, social, cultural and intellectual differences. The north-south dispute that plagued Ming politics corresponds to the third layer. The north-versus-south contention was rhetorical, an... (查看原文)
I have divided my discussion of Li Mengyang’s thought into three main sections. His theory about how the cosmos works and how it affects the human world, his views on how literati learning should be tailored to serve the state, and his insistence that the art of literary writing is an independent pursuit for expressing selfhood were the three pillars of his intellectual vision. In the end it was the third pillar that earned him the reputation for which he is remembered. (查看原文)
哲夫成城
1 有用 暗喜风光似旧年 2023-02-11 16:27:58 北京
李梦阳有《空同子》，何景明有《何子》，或许可以统合起来考察。
1 有用 Koyuki 2023-04-29 15:51:49 山东
非常好的一本书，这本书不但文学学生应读，历史学、哲学、政治学学生也应当阅读。
1 有用 挟书谤王蘑菇酱 2025-03-09 02:24:23 上海
3.5/5，看得出作者有为李梦阳去蔽还真的追求，但是前三部分的内容感觉有点为写而写，看了作者对李梦阳「反理学」的叙述之后，觉得李梦阳未必反周张程朱，反而对其学说有所继承和发挥，感觉李梦阳更像在文学和道学上都秉持某种复古主义。第四部分有启发性，但终究感觉结语比正文精彩，好像作者其实什么问题都关注到了，但是正文中又好像什么问题都没有解决。
0 有用 胡了了 2023-08-22 17:48:20 浙江
翻案去蔽之书，还原出了一个更真实的李梦阳，选取的材料和诗文也足见李梦阳的文学思想和才能，绝不是后世刻板化的空疏之辈。
1 有用 桃十三 2023-02-21 23:22:45 山东
材料丰富，多有共鸣，获益匪浅