Why and how did the strategy of documenting medical practices through personal experience rise to prominence in China? This question is at the heart of Good Formulas, the first book-length study of the use of empirical evidence in Chinese medicine between the ninth and thirteenth centuries. The rise of this new approach to substantiating knowledge, which had appeared only sporadically in earlier medical literature, provides a window into transformations in the construction of textual authority in mid-imperial China.
Focusing on medical genres and working extensively with notebooks (biji), Ruth Yun-Ju Chen shows that employing empirical evidence became prominent in conjunction with a publishing boom that enabled wider availability of medical texts and treatises. To convince a more socioculturally diverse readership to believe their claims and to win intertextual debates with contemporaneous authors, many Song medical authors turned to empirical methodology. Revealing a correlation between publishing cultures and changes in persuasion strategies in medical genres, Good Formulas offers new insights into the histories of medicine, knowledge production, and publishing in China. It also provides rich examples for scholars interested in the development of empirical evidence in the premodern world.
2 有用 小桑拿 2025-03-05 13:59:03 美国
指出了宋代医书中「经验性书写」的大量涌现,但没有以此切入唐宋认识论的变迁,只是依赖现有的二手文献,从不同的角度返回来强调这些「经验性书写」的出现,颇有以大见小之错愕感。但也因为如此,相关话题的二手文献收集得比较齐全,对后续研究者还是蛮有帮助的。另外,作者对「empirical strategy」的定义有些含糊。作者显然指的是一种「书写实践」,分析的重点也应该放在修辞和读者阅读接受的层面。但书中却时... 指出了宋代医书中「经验性书写」的大量涌现,但没有以此切入唐宋认识论的变迁,只是依赖现有的二手文献,从不同的角度返回来强调这些「经验性书写」的出现,颇有以大见小之错愕感。但也因为如此,相关话题的二手文献收集得比较齐全,对后续研究者还是蛮有帮助的。另外,作者对「empirical strategy」的定义有些含糊。作者显然指的是一种「书写实践」,分析的重点也应该放在修辞和读者阅读接受的层面。但书中却时不时地将其当作一种医生获取知识的方式,讨论的重点也转向了「经验主义」的层面,有些让人摸不着头脑。 (展开)
2 有用 Astoria 2024-06-20 13:04:24 北京
讨论宋代医书中的个人经验记录为何兴起,以及宋代出版文化催生出的新的习医环境及中古知识史相关的问题,对于医案这种题材作为文本知识的补证这个观点也可以作为明清医疗史研究的借鉴。其中对于个人经验是否影响了知识理论体系的改写与欧洲知识史产生了更大的学术对话。
0 有用 闻朵 2023-09-21 23:49:11 美国
被封面骗了……没啥本草的东西更多是医方和笔记里的文本分析,虽然还是可以的……