The rich have always fascinated, sometimes in problematic ways. Medieval thinkers feared that the super rich would act “as gods among men”; much more recently Thomas Piketty made wealth central to discussions of inequality. In this book, Guido Alfani offers a history of the rich and super-rich in the West, examining who they were, how they accumulated their wealth and what role they played in society. Covering the last thousand years, with frequent incursions into antiquity, and integrating recent research on economic inequality, Alfani finds—despite the different paths to wealth in different eras—fundamental continuities in the behaviour of the rich and public attitudes toward wealth across Western history. His account offers a novel perspective on current debates about wealth and income disparity.
Alfani argues that the position of the rich and super-rich in Western society has always been intrinsically fragile; their very presence has inspired social unease. In the Middle Ages, an excessive accumulation of wealth was considered sinful; the rich were expected not to appear to be wealthy. Eventually, the rich were deemed useful when they used their wealth to help their communities in times of crisis. Yet in the twenty-first century, Alfani points out, the rich and the super-rich—their wealth largely preserved through the Great Recession and COVID-19—have been exceptionally reluctant to contribute to the common good in times of crisis, rejecting even such stopgap measures as temporary tax increases. History suggests that this is a troubling development—for the rich, and for everyone else.
0 有用 Imalion 2024-05-24 15:40:19 河南
本书综合探讨了多个维度的社会与经济现象,聚焦在财富的本质、数量、集中程度及其对社会的影响上。财富并不仅仅是金钱或物质的堆积,更涉及到人们的消费习惯、储蓄观念以及对待财富的态度。同时,本书也揭示了财富过度集中的问题,以及超级富豪与政治的紧密联系,这些都是当代社会亟待解决的重要议题。===没有提出足够令人震惊的新东西。
0 有用 Easypour Spout 2024-10-29 16:50:12 广东
不理解为什么这本书在Amazon上评分那么高。这本书有超级多的长难句,长难句里面是各种修饰用的没多大意义的从句,这种文风实在太烂了,使我读来毫无乐趣可言。难道是偏学术类的书都喜欢这么写? 而且这本书的conclusion其实是没有conclusion,说了一堆老生常谈的废话,又无法得出有意义的结论。感觉不值一读。 PS. 事实证明Amazon上书的评分是一坨狗屎。