The dangers of immediacy: why speed, flow, and direct expression now dominate cultural style
Contemporary cultural style rejects mediation in favor of direct access, extreme affect, and rapid uptake. These are values it borrows from the economic conditions of “disintermediation”: cutting out the middleman. Like Uber, but for art. Immediacy names this style to make sense of what we lose when the contradictions of 21st century capitalism demand that art pretend it isn’t.
Smearing our noses in realness seems to be the only goal of much of contemporary culture, and that goal synchs with the economic imperative to intensify circulation when production stagnates. Circulation strives to be instantaneous, with “flow” the ultimate 21st century buzzword, but these speedy gears grind art down to the nub. And the bad news is, the political turmoil and social challenges we face, climate crisis foremost among them, require more rather than less mediation. Collective will, inspiring ideas, and deliberate construction are the only way out, but our dominant style undoes them.
Considering original streaming tv, popular fiction, artworld trends, and academic theories, Immediacy explains the recent obsession with immersion, authenticity, and total transparency, and it points to alternative forms of representation in photography, tv, novels, and constructive theory, that prioritize distance, impersonality, and big ideas instead.
2 有用 Ludwigsama 2024-12-21 01:19:33 美国
这书其实非常好。Kornbluh是一个本雅明式的观察者。她善于搜集各种意象的碎片(从新媒体到自小说到短视频到后理论)并在它们的并置中观察到资本主义的总体性。很多人会认为Kornbluh的评论是碎片式的(too late capitalism一会是immanent presentism一会是流动的绝对的统治一会是自我-资本逻辑对生活的全面侵入等等),但正是这些互相平行的碎片构成了资本主义正在经历的持... 这书其实非常好。Kornbluh是一个本雅明式的观察者。她善于搜集各种意象的碎片(从新媒体到自小说到短视频到后理论)并在它们的并置中观察到资本主义的总体性。很多人会认为Kornbluh的评论是碎片式的(too late capitalism一会是immanent presentism一会是流动的绝对的统治一会是自我-资本逻辑对生活的全面侵入等等),但正是这些互相平行的碎片构成了资本主义正在经历的持续性积累危机的全貌。一切都太快了,但什么又没有发生—这就是secular stagnation的含义。批判理论确实再没有能力去呈现这个复杂总体,最终不得不退缩到对直接性的崇拜当中。 (展开)
2 有用 Yinanaa 2024-09-17 10:10:22 美国
Intro. 在内容和风格上都很“复古”——在post-critique时代坚持(还是固守?)critique. immediacy作为critical category可能反而太大了?无所不包。另外intro中用来引人入胜的art as NFT到去年(2023)为止已经完全崩溃了......人文学者写作的某种可怕命运。
2 有用 -Hyperion- 2025-02-18 00:41:05 荷兰
overall quite a textbook of late 20C and 21C political and aesthetic articulations and Kornbluh nicely catches "mediation" as an axis. what remains dissatisfying is that less ink is used to suggest ou... overall quite a textbook of late 20C and 21C political and aesthetic articulations and Kornbluh nicely catches "mediation" as an axis. what remains dissatisfying is that less ink is used to suggest our possible way out than attacking the immediacy style which to me is read reductively, especially with her sometimes aggressive and mean voice. (展开)
2 有用 Polyommatinae 2025-05-21 19:01:05 比利时
写得好的地方自不用说,符合传统的美学分析路径又结合了当代政治气象,还用immediacy的概念打通了media/algorithm这条新型路径在分析的可行性和延展性方面令人神清气爽。缺点在于很多时候我都觉得从单个事例分析到结论的速度有点太快,然后在辅助同一个argument的时候先不加区分的丢一堆例子的parallelism的力度有待商榷。但好在文献综述的精准和广度都很不错,并且我的总体观感还是以... 写得好的地方自不用说,符合传统的美学分析路径又结合了当代政治气象,还用immediacy的概念打通了media/algorithm这条新型路径在分析的可行性和延展性方面令人神清气爽。缺点在于很多时候我都觉得从单个事例分析到结论的速度有点太快,然后在辅助同一个argument的时候先不加区分的丢一堆例子的parallelism的力度有待商榷。但好在文献综述的精准和广度都很不错,并且我的总体观感还是以积极为主,因为比起来还是更讨厌当代一些打着书写经验旗号实则不知所云的low-stake fog machine :)) (展开)
0 有用 一块红布 2025-11-29 13:01:37 加拿大
痛批“后批判”和ANT,强调中介的重要性。我很赞同作者的观点,但书中的举证实在是太糟糕了。