Henri Bergson (1859-1941) was once the most famous philosopher in the world, but his reputation waned in the latter half of the 20th century. Barry Allen here makes the case for Bergson as a great philosopher, one whose thought has much to contribute to contemporary philosophical questions. Living in Time presents chapters on each of Bergson's four major works, explaining his theories of time, perception, memory, and panpsychic consciousness, his innovative concept of virtual existence, his objection to Darwin, his controversy with Einstein, his philosophy of creative evolution, and his social philosophy of closed and open society.
In particular Allen focusses on Bergson's powerful ideas on time. Classical arguments for determinism fallaciously apply spatial concepts to consciousness; once we take time seriously, which means acknowledging its reality as duration and its difference from space, Bergson showed that the arguments for determinism become insupportable. Bergson's ideas on time and evolution offer a comparison with Nietzsche, which Allen develops, exposing both philosophical concurrence and systematic difference. The book's conclusion discusses the question of Bergson and naturalism and summarizes the ontology of the virtual that emerges as a core part of Bergson's thought.
3 有用 神秘作用子结构 2025-06-16 21:13:02 上海
迄今读过最均衡的柏格森总论:提供不少难得的史实如生机论等;大量联系分析哲学和自然科学作旁证;解释具体观点时会说明其古典来源;深度上没有放弃繁复体、非存在的虚拟、与科学和而不同的生成/直觉形而上学等,且表达得清晰优雅,堪比柏本人。不过柏的同时代人只对比了尼采,声称二者根本上一致,但柏对开放社会的追求和对笑的批评与尼采之区别未积极展开;未更系统地呈现柏的体系性,总结称柏有三个存在模式虚拟、物质和活力未... 迄今读过最均衡的柏格森总论:提供不少难得的史实如生机论等;大量联系分析哲学和自然科学作旁证;解释具体观点时会说明其古典来源;深度上没有放弃繁复体、非存在的虚拟、与科学和而不同的生成/直觉形而上学等,且表达得清晰优雅,堪比柏本人。不过柏的同时代人只对比了尼采,声称二者根本上一致,但柏对开放社会的追求和对笑的批评与尼采之区别未积极展开;未更系统地呈现柏的体系性,总结称柏有三个存在模式虚拟、物质和活力未免简单,活力和物质是虚拟触动现实的两种功能性实体,前者在后者之上追求后者又被后者阻碍,同时会被虚拟重启,因此只有两组繁复体及其关系;难得关注了柏格森的技术哲学,但对《两个来源》和艺术哲学着墨不多;另外常回避直观、进化论、宗教的具体论点,考虑到柏在英美有非理性主义的名号,这是明智的选择,就是稍显可惜。 (展开)