Small Spaces recasts the history of the British empire by focusing on the small spaces that made the empire possible. It takes as its subject a series of small architectural spaces, objects, and landscapes and uses them to narrate the untold stories of the marginalized people-the servants, women, children, subalterns, and racialized minorities-who held up the infrastructure of empire. In so doing it opens up an important new approach to architectural history: an invitation to shift our attention from the large to the small scale.
Taking the British empire in India as its primary focus, this book presents eighteen short, readable chapters to explore an array of overlooked places and spaces. From cook rooms and slave quarters to outhouses, go-downs, and medicine cupboards, each chapter reveals how and why these kinds of minor spaces are so important to understanding colonialism. With the focus of history so often on the large scale - global trade networks, vast regions, and architectures of power and domination - Small Spaces shows instead how we need to rethink this aura of magnitude so that our reading is not beholden such imperialist optics.
With chapters which can be read separately as individual accounts of objects, spaces, and buildings, and introductions showing how this critical methodology can challenge the methods and theories of urban and architectural history, Small Spaces is a must-read for anyone wishing to decolonize disciplinary practices in the field of architectural, urban, and colonial history. Altogether, it provides a paradigm-breaking account of how to 'unlearn empire', whether in British India or elsewhere.
1 有用 felsina 2025-03-21 00:40:03 意大利
4.5 真要感谢这本书,虽然研究语境(殖民时期印度建筑空间)截然不同却在不少出乎意料的点上和自己的研究关切有各种交叉,感叹南亚学者的理论功底真的是太好了。本书是事业中期的野心之作,兼具理论意识、开阔的文献素材和语境视野。特别令人印象深刻的一是从后殖民视角对帝国地理的批判、史学理论的尺度探讨和建筑史三个角度来审视“尺度”概念的潜力,二是巧用不同类型的文献和档案来与传统帝国殖民史学视角做协商(尤其是文... 4.5 真要感谢这本书,虽然研究语境(殖民时期印度建筑空间)截然不同却在不少出乎意料的点上和自己的研究关切有各种交叉,感叹南亚学者的理论功底真的是太好了。本书是事业中期的野心之作,兼具理论意识、开阔的文献素材和语境视野。特别令人印象深刻的一是从后殖民视角对帝国地理的批判、史学理论的尺度探讨和建筑史三个角度来审视“尺度”概念的潜力,二是巧用不同类型的文献和档案来与传统帝国殖民史学视角做协商(尤其是文学文本的应用),三是把十九世纪南亚殖民和北美奴隶制做去特例化和去地方化的比较研究,非常娴熟的让两个语境下的理论探讨产生了有益的对话,而不是简单套用另一语境产生的理论。几个理论探讨章节极有启发,但后半段概念征引太过驳杂,结尾对物质文化和建筑之间关系的探讨也不够有突破。 (展开)
1 有用 Patrick Magnus 2024-10-26 18:45:03 中国香港
路易康的服务空间与被服务空间,起源于全球殖民时期的西方中心观点。Swati对其的批判建立于对小型空间的使用者与社会语境的分析,各种各样的不起眼的空间物品,如储物室,奴隶用的service passageway,印度仆人给英国主人扇扇子的verandah还有给全室内降温的手动风扇系统,这些东西构成了隐藏于地域视角下帝国的社会关系,而这些小空间也可以作为被压迫者反击殖民者power relation的... 路易康的服务空间与被服务空间,起源于全球殖民时期的西方中心观点。Swati对其的批判建立于对小型空间的使用者与社会语境的分析,各种各样的不起眼的空间物品,如储物室,奴隶用的service passageway,印度仆人给英国主人扇扇子的verandah还有给全室内降温的手动风扇系统,这些东西构成了隐藏于地域视角下帝国的社会关系,而这些小空间也可以作为被压迫者反击殖民者power relation的借力工具,destablise the territorial dominance of empire(如印度十九世纪中期的叛乱) (展开)