In imperial China, people moved away from the gender they were assigned at birth in different ways and for many reasons. Eunuchs, boy actresses, and clergy left behind normative gender roles defined by family and procreation. “Stone maidens”—women deemed physically incapable of vaginal intercourse—might depart from families or marriages to become Buddhist or Daoist nuns. Anatomical males who presented as women sometimes took a conventionally female occupation such as midwife, faith healer, or even medium to a fox spirit. Yet they were often punished harshly for the crime of “masquerading in women’s attire,” suspected of sexual predation, even when they had lived peacefully in their communities for many years.
Exploring these histories and many more, this book is a groundbreaking study of transgender lives and practices in late imperial China. Through close readings of court cases, as well as Ming and Qing fiction and nineteenth-century newspaper accounts, Matthew H. Sommer examines the social, legal, and cultural histories of gender crossing. He considers a range of transgender experiences, illuminating how certain forms of gender transgression were sanctioned in particular social contexts and penalized in others. Sommer scrutinizes the ways Qing legal authorities and literati writers represented and understood gender-nonconforming people and practices, contrasting official ideology with popular mentalities. An unprecedented account of China’s transgender histories, this book also sheds new light on a range of themes in Ming and Qing law, religion, medicine, literature, and culture.
2 有用 Hayashiiii 2024-04-18 22:35:44 美国
期待了好久的作品,爽读!
5 有用 munianli 2024-05-27 18:38:31 中国香港
Sommer的写作很温柔及平和,对transgender practices葆有较强同理心进行梳理。很好奇这话题真的能引进吗?那是不是未来我那未动笔的博论也有中译的希望….
0 有用 NRO 2025-05-12 21:34:55 北京
再也无法直视pop out这个词…
0 有用 felsina 2025-02-05 18:28:18 意大利
4.5 可以看出是一个法律史/性别史老手的手笔,既细致又广阔,故事引人入胜,且在处理当代概念和历史语境的张力上做的非常得当。个人觉得很受益的是这样的跨性别史可以通过置换历史和文化语境让当代人反观自己当下的认知和偏见(尤其是用男扮女装来映照当代transphobia),暂时感觉类似策略在种族问题上可能起不到类似效果。另一个疑问在于作者征引的案例时期跨度不小,但除了一个个案例分析以外,似乎没有涉及不同... 4.5 可以看出是一个法律史/性别史老手的手笔,既细致又广阔,故事引人入胜,且在处理当代概念和历史语境的张力上做的非常得当。个人觉得很受益的是这样的跨性别史可以通过置换历史和文化语境让当代人反观自己当下的认知和偏见(尤其是用男扮女装来映照当代transphobia),暂时感觉类似策略在种族问题上可能起不到类似效果。另一个疑问在于作者征引的案例时期跨度不小,但除了一个个案例分析以外,似乎没有涉及不同历史时刻之间的社会变化和语境。但真是相当好看,期待中译! (展开)
16 有用 非必要也赚梁皇 2024-01-24 15:39:33 北京
会引进。这书如果我起中文名,大概会叫《粉墨》hhh