In early nineteenth-century China, a remarkable transformation took place in the art world: artists among China’s educated elites began to use touch to forge a more authentic relationship to the past, to challenge stagnant artistic canons, and to foster deeper human connections. Networks of Touch is an engaging exploration of this sensory turn.
In this book, Michael J. Hatch examines the artistic network of Ruan Yuan (1764–1849), a scholar-official whose patronage supported a generation of artists and learned people who prioritized epigraphic research as a means of truing the warped contours of Confucian heritage. Their work instigated an “epigraphic aesthetic”―an appropriation of the stylistic, material, and tactile features of ancient inscribed objects and their reproductive technologies―in late eighteenth- and early nineteenth-century artwork. Rubbings, a reduplicative technology, challenged the dominance of brushwork as the bearer of artistic authority. While brushwork represented the artist’s physical presence through ink and paper, rubbings were direct facsimiles of tactile experiences with objects. This shift empowered artists and scholars to transcend traditional conventions and explore new mediums, uniting previously separate image-making practices while engaging audiences through the senses.
Centering on touch and presenting a fresh perspective on early nineteenth-century literati art in China, this volume sheds light on a period often dismissed as lacking innovation and calls into question optical realism’s perceived supremacy in reshaping the sensory experience of the modern Chinese viewer.
1 有用 gabriel.weng1 2025-05-08 14:27:25 加拿大
明显感觉感官史的框架是作者成书阶段才加上去的,博士阶段探讨19世纪初的金石书画也许仅仅就是因为研究得少吧。考证学的直接影响也值得推敲,毕竟扬州八怪的实践明显早于其措意的阮元圈子。其提出的“触觉”转向也许只是文人文化背后的rhizomatic way of thinking的内部调适而已。