Mark Schroeder, University of Southern California, and Nathan Howard, University of Toronto
Nathan Robert Howard is Assistant Professor of Philosophy at the University of Toronto. His work ranges across issues in normative ethics, metaethics, bioethics, and related areas, and has been published in Ethics, Nous, The Journal of Philosophy, Philosophers' Imprint, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Oxford Studies in Metaethics, and other venues. He is currently at work on questions about consent and refusal in health care, good moral motivation, and teleology in ethics and action.
Mark Schroeder is Professor of Philosophy at the University of Southern California. He has published over one hundred philosophy articles on topics in metaethics, normative ethics, epistemology, action theory, philosophy of language, and related areas. His previous books about reasons include Slaves of the Passions (2007), Explanation and Expression in Ethics, volume 1: Explaining the Reasons We Share (2014), and Reasons First (2021). He is currently working on exploring the consequences of philosophical accounts of the nature of persons for the dynamics of interpersonal relationships and interpersonal conflict.
0 有用 项平 2024-11-30 17:42:35 德国
Silva的Seminar文献,改天有空把课堂反馈写出来。对我来说规范性这个领域啃Broome啃Finlay实在太无聊了,这本两百页教材简直迟来正义,虽然同时处理这么多细碎讨论读着还是很困。写成了教材,不过两位作者没打算把观点藏起来,比如第五章讨论主客观理由都可以reduced to core reasons。要挑不足的话,这一章直接说“ought”的共同图景是对realistic和epistem... Silva的Seminar文献,改天有空把课堂反馈写出来。对我来说规范性这个领域啃Broome啃Finlay实在太无聊了,这本两百页教材简直迟来正义,虽然同时处理这么多细碎讨论读着还是很困。写成了教材,不过两位作者没打算把观点藏起来,比如第五章讨论主客观理由都可以reduced to core reasons。要挑不足的话,这一章直接说“ought”的共同图景是对realistic和epistemic两种deontic modals的选择,缺了Copp、Baker那边一串关于Simpliciter的讨论,有点省事。第六章关于evidence的有些立场(关于理由存在的理由本身可以成为理由,但关于不存在理由的报告本身不是理由,页110)没写得太明白,还得回Schroeder 2009。 (展开)