Andrew Shanks brings together a grand narrative of theology and continental philosophy to argue that the 'solidarity of the shaken' is the kingdom of God in secular dress. Shanks engages with the philosophy of Jan Patocka; specifically, his Heretical Essays in the Philosophy of History, which culminate in the concept of the ‘solidarity of the shaken’. Such solidarity is quite simply that which empowers the most radically thoughtful openness to others, embattled against even the most repressive closure; a solidarity without any other essential qualification. Split into three distinct parts, Shanks begins by discussing Patocka’s philosophico-centric grand narrative, and drawing wider reference to the pre-philosophic origins of Abrahamic religious tradition. This is followed by an exploration of mystical theology, Christian and Islamic; of its decay into ‘mysticism’, and its influence on Christian and Jewish gnostic traditions. The final third presents a discussion on ethical phenomenology. Analysing the proponents of a ‘pathos of shakenness’ such as Kierkegaard, Levinas, Løgstrup, he juxtaposes 19th-century thinkers such as Arendt and Hegel with Heidegger and Strauss as he moves through the century, and eventually to the rise of secular public conscience movement.
3 有用 ʇɐɥdɔsǝpıɹı3 2025-06-13 07:12:31 四川
也许是神学延异的另一种诠释(form of enduring),Erwartung作为内时间意识的主动结构,预设了一个即将到来的Erfüllung,在末世论的时间结构中,patience是这一满现的中止,是结构性的现象学迟延,主体被抛掷于“未有”事件的敞开中,因此成为世界仍可经验的残余形式。传统伦理学中的耐心是强迫压抑性的规范属性,而在末日范式下,它成为目的性的否定;狄奥尼修斯的神秘神学强调神的不... 也许是神学延异的另一种诠释(form of enduring),Erwartung作为内时间意识的主动结构,预设了一个即将到来的Erfüllung,在末世论的时间结构中,patience是这一满现的中止,是结构性的现象学迟延,主体被抛掷于“未有”事件的敞开中,因此成为世界仍可经验的残余形式。传统伦理学中的耐心是强迫压抑性的规范属性,而在末日范式下,它成为目的性的否定;狄奥尼修斯的神秘神学强调神的不可指名,一切真正的神学必须进入否定神学(不可接近之存在),在诺斯替中,Andrew将耐心定义为一种对神性显现的中止/apophasis经验,它同时对应了两个时间的阶向:启示的尚未发生与救赎的尚未降临,而在其中保留了上帝失席中的空位,它不是等待之中的祈祷和期待,而作为通向神的德性沉默,以无我通向他者。 (展开)