What does it mean to write in a socialist revolution? What defines labor in a communist society? In revolutionary China, writers were regularly dispatched to the countryside or factories with the expectation that, through immersion in the life of workers and peasants, they would be remade as “culture workers” whose writing could serve the communist project. Their cultural labor would not merely reflect or represent the process of building socialism—it would actively participate in it by excavating the contradictions and challenges of the ongoing reorganization of social relations.
Benjamin Kindler examines how writing transformed the Chinese Revolution even as the revolution remade what it meant to write. He argues that the revolution sought in unparalleled ways to overcome the basic division between those who write and those who work. This book combines close readings of a wide range of texts—from the works of established figures to the writings of amateur workers drawn from the factory floor—with analysis of Chinese socialist political economy. Far from being drab instances of state propaganda, these texts and cultural experiments were lively and inventive attempts to determine what a different, more equal society might look like. Offering new ways to understand cultural production as a material, embodied process, this book reconsiders the role of art and literature in radical politics.
10 有用 叮叮当当 2025-07-05 01:04:32 河北
在新书中属于品质垫底的一类吧,显而易见的拼写错误不说,许多论点也经不起推敲,感觉像学生作业加工后匆忙上线,参考文献也是偷工减料的。虽说大学出版社照顾自家的毕业生是人之常情,但是选品还是可以更精细和透明一些,才能对得起这块招牌。
0 有用 不宣 2026-02-28 14:56:47 北京
某些地方关于时间性的论述看着有些模糊(特别是把政治经济学教材和下乡青年小说的形式并举时),但问题意识是相当好的。写作者总是过着一种双重生活,因而其意识形态始终可疑;他们对共产主义英雄/新人的塑造折射出寻找一种恰当的时间性来反映其形象的焦虑,而其最终的选择也反映着当时的政治话语。归根结底,共产主义英雄应在日常的、平凡的、集体的劳动中诞生,落脚点最终还是在书题的“labor”之上。批判劳动人文主义是一... 某些地方关于时间性的论述看着有些模糊(特别是把政治经济学教材和下乡青年小说的形式并举时),但问题意识是相当好的。写作者总是过着一种双重生活,因而其意识形态始终可疑;他们对共产主义英雄/新人的塑造折射出寻找一种恰当的时间性来反映其形象的焦虑,而其最终的选择也反映着当时的政治话语。归根结底,共产主义英雄应在日常的、平凡的、集体的劳动中诞生,落脚点最终还是在书题的“labor”之上。批判劳动人文主义是一项必须的工作,但更重要的是寻找那些日常的再生产劳动,把握它们打开新的乌托邦空间的潜能。 (展开)