Nishant Upadhyay unravels Indian diasporic complicity in its ongoing colonial relationship with Indigenous peoples, lands, and nations in Canada. Upadhyay examines the interwoven and simultaneous areas of dominant Indian caste complicity in processes of settler colonialism, antiblackness, capitalism, brahminical supremacy, Hindu nationalism, and heteropatriarchy. Resource extraction in British Columbia in the 1970s through the 1990s and in present-day Alberta offers examples of spaces that illuminate the dispossession of Indigenous peoples and simultaneously reveals racialized, gendered, and casted labor formations. Upadhyay juxtaposes these extraction sites with examples of anticolonial activism and solidarities from Tkaronto. Analyzing silence on settler colonialism and brahminical caste supremacy, Upadhyay upends the idea of dominant caste Indian diasporas as racially victimized and shows that claiming victimhood denies a very real complicity in enforcing other power structures. Exploring stories of quotidian proximity and intimacy between Indigenous and South Asian communities, Upadhyay offers meditations on anticolonial and anti-casteist ways of knowledge production, ethical relationalities, and solidarities.
Groundbreaking and ambitious, Indians on Indian Lands presents the case for holding Indian diasporas accountable for acts of violence within a colonial settler nation.
1 有用 Enlightening 2024-11-25 14:47:25 加拿大
这学期presentation的书,作者是加拿大出生、印度长大的婆罗门非二元(自述访谈中pass as cis male),新意在于将种姓制度引入离散印度人社区的讨论,其余大多重复Asian Canadian Studies的教条论点,可供参考的是强调了卑诗省(考虑到移民的种族化历史)相比于其他省份印度裔加拿大人和原住民之间相对更亲密/临近,最后一章关于印度裔和原住民的亲密关系的理论化为colon... 这学期presentation的书,作者是加拿大出生、印度长大的婆罗门非二元(自述访谈中pass as cis male),新意在于将种姓制度引入离散印度人社区的讨论,其余大多重复Asian Canadian Studies的教条论点,可供参考的是强调了卑诗省(考虑到移民的种族化历史)相比于其他省份印度裔加拿大人和原住民之间相对更亲密/临近,最后一章关于印度裔和原住民的亲密关系的理论化为colonial intimacy也并无新意,关于跨(特定)种族亲密关系访谈失效而借用美学的写作似乎反证将结构化访谈作为锚点方法本身的局限。 (展开)