For decades, many people on the left have decried the finance sector as the main culprit for the toxic effects of capitalism. Financialization is commonly invoked to explain everything from growing inequality to the housing crises and the destruction of the environment. Only by confronting finance, so the story goes, can there be any hope for a more sustainable economy.
In this new intervention, Nick Bernards makes the case against the dominance of this story. Arguing that the concept of financialization is ill-understood and overworked, Bernards shows how we risk glossing over the true nature of capitalism when focusing on the mythical powers of finance. The moralistic distinction between harmful 'financial' and more honest 'real' economies leads to an impasse if we want to better understand how exploitation truly manifests.
Rather than indulging in the harmful fantasy that confronting the financial elite will fix the economy, Bernards provides an alternative approach. Starting from the premise that risk and speculation are core to the operation of all capital and not just the hallmark of a perverted financial sector, this Marxist reading of the interconnection between capitalism's uneven exploitation of labour and nature and financial capital lays the groundwork for a much-needed view of the real powers of finance.
3 有用 吴衢 2025-03-10 17:09:03 英国
面向左翼乃至马克思主义内部争论的一本书。这书写的和我自己解决新自由主义问题的思路几乎一样,看得汗流浃背。核心关切是质疑“金融化”概念的普遍性和时间性,因而反对相应的改良主义观点。作者认为,金融应该被理解为一个过程,资本循环的内在部分,而不是理解为一个具有过多权力的利益集团。那么如何解释世界资本主义在过去四五十年的变化呢?作者将其归因于空间发展不均衡和政治结构变迁,并通过对自然和国家的分析强调不是金... 面向左翼乃至马克思主义内部争论的一本书。这书写的和我自己解决新自由主义问题的思路几乎一样,看得汗流浃背。核心关切是质疑“金融化”概念的普遍性和时间性,因而反对相应的改良主义观点。作者认为,金融应该被理解为一个过程,资本循环的内在部分,而不是理解为一个具有过多权力的利益集团。那么如何解释世界资本主义在过去四五十年的变化呢?作者将其归因于空间发展不均衡和政治结构变迁,并通过对自然和国家的分析强调不是金融资本的疯狂扩张而是再生产环节的危机。总之,该书澄清了许多马克思主义的观点,并且囊括了许多不同领域的马克思主义讨论,值得一读。 (展开)