作者:
Fredrik Barth 出版社: Little Brown & Co (T) 副标题: The Social Organization of Culture Difference 出版年: 1969-6 页数: 153 定价: USD 10.75 装帧: Paperback ISBN: 9780316082464
When originally published in Norway, Ethnic Groups and Boundaries marked the transition to a new era of ethnic studies. Today this much-cited classic is regarded as the seminal volume from which stems much current anthropological thinking about ethnicity. Ethnic Groups and Boundaries opens with Barth’s invaluable thirty-page essay that introduces students to important theoretic...
When originally published in Norway, Ethnic Groups and Boundaries marked the transition to a new era of ethnic studies. Today this much-cited classic is regarded as the seminal volume from which stems much current anthropological thinking about ethnicity. Ethnic Groups and Boundaries opens with Barth’s invaluable thirty-page essay that introduces students to important theoretical issues in the analysis of ethnic groups. Following is a collection of seven essays—the results of a symposium involving a small group of Scandinavian social anthropologists—intended to illustrate the application of Barth’s analytical viewpoints to different sides of the problems of polyethnic organization in various ethnographic areas, including Norway, Sudan, Ethiopia, Mexico, Afghanistan, and Laos.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction (Fredrik Barth)
2. When Ethnic Identity Is a Social Stigma (Harald Eidheim)
3. Economic Determinants in Ethnic Processes (Gunnar Haaland)
4. Ethnic and Cultural Differentiation (Jan-Petter Blom)
5. Dichotomization and Integration (Karl Eric Knutsson)
· · · · · ·
(更多)
Table of Contents
1. Introduction (Fredrik Barth)
2. When Ethnic Identity Is a Social Stigma (Harald Eidheim)
3. Economic Determinants in Ethnic Processes (Gunnar Haaland)
4. Ethnic and Cultural Differentiation (Jan-Petter Blom)
5. Dichotomization and Integration (Karl Eric Knutsson)
6. Ethnic Stability and Boundary Dynamics in Southern Mexico (Henning Siverts)
7. Pathan Identity and Its Maintenance (Fredrik Barth)
8. Neighbours in Laos (Karl G. Izikowitz)
· · · · · · (收起)
It is important to recognize that although ethnic categories take cul- tural differences into account, we can assume no simple one-to-one relationship between ethnic units and cultural similarities and differ- ences. The features that are taken into account are not the sum of 'objective' differences, but only those which the actors themselves regard as significant. Not only do ecologic variations mark and exag- gerate differences; some cultural features are used by the actors as signals and emblems of differences, others are ignored, and in some relationships radical differences are played down and denied. The cul- tural contents of ethnic dichotomies would seem analytically to be of two orders: (i) overt signals or signs - the diacritical features that people look for and exhibit to show ... (查看原文)
1. ethnic group as a type of social organization; 2. focusing on the boundary construction processes (dichotomization processes) rather than the cultural content; 3. ascription and self-ascription; 4....1. ethnic group as a type of social organization; 2. focusing on the boundary construction processes (dichotomization processes) rather than the cultural content; 3. ascription and self-ascription; 4. role of elites in ethnic politics; 5. the emergence of boundaries - interaction - Goffman. 6. see also Barth (1994)(展开)
读了导言部分。族群是主观认同的范畴。构成族群的是边界，而非语言、文化等内涵。实际上，在互动过程中，文化/体质特征差异常被用来划分族群的边界，甚至可以被主观制造出来（构建论 vs 原生论）。在生态资源竞争中，人们使用族群认同排斥他者（工具论）。此外，对多元族群社会的族群分层、少数族群，以及族群认同变迁的讨论很有启发。其中强调了精英在族群认同形成中的主导作用（vs 王明珂使用社会记忆理论对此提供了更细...读了导言部分。族群是主观认同的范畴。构成族群的是边界，而非语言、文化等内涵。实际上，在互动过程中，文化/体质特征差异常被用来划分族群的边界，甚至可以被主观制造出来（构建论 vs 原生论）。在生态资源竞争中，人们使用族群认同排斥他者（工具论）。此外，对多元族群社会的族群分层、少数族群，以及族群认同变迁的讨论很有启发。其中强调了精英在族群认同形成中的主导作用（vs 王明珂使用社会记忆理论对此提供了更细致的解释）。(展开)
弗雷德里克·巴斯 作者
散仙儿
商务印书馆2014版
1 有用 梁 2016-10-17 09:02:38
1. ethnic group as a type of social organization; 2. focusing on the boundary construction processes (dichotomization processes) rather than the cultural content; 3. ascription and self-ascription; 4.... 1. ethnic group as a type of social organization; 2. focusing on the boundary construction processes (dichotomization processes) rather than the cultural content; 3. ascription and self-ascription; 4. role of elites in ethnic politics; 5. the emergence of boundaries - interaction - Goffman. 6. see also Barth (1994) (展开)
0 有用 流水小铁 2022-09-28 11:21:50 福建
正如昨晚与理论学霸微信聊天紧张焦灼态，读巴斯也是一件十分抽象到让人头疼的事情。能厘清的一些输入：1⃣️族群边界是动态的，乃至存在一个中间地带的；2⃣️族群边界产生于社会互动，而国家边界的生成则涉及更多意义上的互动；3⃣️警惕掉入客观特征论的陷阱，即是说时刻反思自己是在以何种视角界定他者文化；4⃣️生态学和人口统计学观点是否是一种工具论的视角？（动机是资源竞争？还没读懂2022.9.28
1 有用 cast-l 2023-03-28 17:14:57 云南
中译版翻了好几遍，始终云里雾里，一直以为是翻得太渣了，原来是原文写的就难懂（但不代表翻译不渣）。核心书目但又不能透彻理解是一件十分痛苦的事。
1 有用 竹里歌 2018-11-09 22:27:34
《族群与边界》，pdf
0 有用 羊咩咩 2018-10-11 17:01:48
Core module必读。特么看不懂。
1 有用 cast-l 2023-03-28 17:14:57 云南
中译版翻了好几遍，始终云里雾里，一直以为是翻得太渣了，原来是原文写的就难懂（但不代表翻译不渣）。核心书目但又不能透彻理解是一件十分痛苦的事。
0 有用 流水小铁 2022-09-28 11:21:50 福建
正如昨晚与理论学霸微信聊天紧张焦灼态，读巴斯也是一件十分抽象到让人头疼的事情。能厘清的一些输入：1⃣️族群边界是动态的，乃至存在一个中间地带的；2⃣️族群边界产生于社会互动，而国家边界的生成则涉及更多意义上的互动；3⃣️警惕掉入客观特征论的陷阱，即是说时刻反思自己是在以何种视角界定他者文化；4⃣️生态学和人口统计学观点是否是一种工具论的视角？（动机是资源竞争？还没读懂2022.9.28
0 有用 soclost 2022-05-17 00:26:58
读了导言部分。族群是主观认同的范畴。构成族群的是边界，而非语言、文化等内涵。实际上，在互动过程中，文化/体质特征差异常被用来划分族群的边界，甚至可以被主观制造出来（构建论 vs 原生论）。在生态资源竞争中，人们使用族群认同排斥他者（工具论）。此外，对多元族群社会的族群分层、少数族群，以及族群认同变迁的讨论很有启发。其中强调了精英在族群认同形成中的主导作用（vs 王明珂使用社会记忆理论对此提供了更细... 读了导言部分。族群是主观认同的范畴。构成族群的是边界，而非语言、文化等内涵。实际上，在互动过程中，文化/体质特征差异常被用来划分族群的边界，甚至可以被主观制造出来（构建论 vs 原生论）。在生态资源竞争中，人们使用族群认同排斥他者（工具论）。此外，对多元族群社会的族群分层、少数族群，以及族群认同变迁的讨论很有启发。其中强调了精英在族群认同形成中的主导作用（vs 王明珂使用社会记忆理论对此提供了更细致的解释）。 (展开)
0 有用 柚儿圆 2021-03-24 10:36:31
读了第一二章，非常不错，特别是巴斯关于边界的探讨，非常有启发。
0 有用 HicSuntLeones 2020-03-19 00:44:00
fluid content and clearly demarcated ethnic boundaries (the nature of ethnicity)