A renowned political scientist and legal theorist, Professor Knight’s scholarly work focuses on modern social and political theory, law and legal theory, and political economy. He holds a joint appointment with Duke Law School and Duke’s Trinity College of Arts and Sciences, where he teaches in the Politics, Philosophy and Economics Program. At the Law School, he teaches courses on social scientific approaches to law and courts, as well as courses on the political economy of social institutions.
Professor Knight’s research focuses on the rules and norms that organize human activities in nations. In addition to study of the motivations and decisions of judges, he has examined the effects of the norm of extensive prior judicial experience as a prerequisite for service on the U.S. Supreme Court, as well as several other aspects of how courts make decisions and how judges choose their positions in opinions.
Professor Knight is the author of several books: Institutions and Social Conflict(Cambridge University Press, 1992), Explaining Social Institutions (with Itai Sened) (The University of Michigan Press, 1995), and The Choices Justices Make(with Lee Epstein) (Congressional Quarterly Press, 1997), which won the American Political Science Association’s C. Herman Prichett Award for the best book published on law and courts. He co-edited Courts, Judges and Politics(McGraw-Hill, 6th Edition, 2005) and has published numerous articles in journals and edited volumes on such topics as democratic theory, the rule of law, judicial decision-making, and theories of institutional emergence and change.
Professor Knight holds a bachelor’s degree and JD from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and an MA and a PhD in political science from the University of Chicago.
0 有用 秋江暝泊 2012-10-23 21:35:27
传承制度学派,补充了冲突、分配和权力的视角
0 有用 功夫熊猫小碗熊 2015-02-09 09:21:45
总结现有制度理论并发展一种新的制度研究和思考路径。制度确实有利于固化集体的未来期望、塑造固定的互动和集体行动模式、提供信息促进策略性合作,但其主要功能并非提供收益、安全或减少不确定性,而是平息权力和资源/利益分配上的冲突,促成并巩固一种相对均衡的资源分配模式。制度将群体间的愿望结晶化成相对可持续和有合法性的规则、范式、规矩、法律等。权力和分配冲突再起的时候,制度变革随之发生;权力和分配相对稳定且各... 总结现有制度理论并发展一种新的制度研究和思考路径。制度确实有利于固化集体的未来期望、塑造固定的互动和集体行动模式、提供信息促进策略性合作,但其主要功能并非提供收益、安全或减少不确定性,而是平息权力和资源/利益分配上的冲突,促成并巩固一种相对均衡的资源分配模式。制度将群体间的愿望结晶化成相对可持续和有合法性的规则、范式、规矩、法律等。权力和分配冲突再起的时候,制度变革随之发生;权力和分配相对稳定且各方收益均衡的时候制度则比较有延续和稳定性。为了超越制度的功能性解释之哲学(有用故存在、存在即合理)而将制度视为了权力和分配的副产物。 (展开)
0 有用 DerLetzteLord 2022-10-31 19:31:49 上海
institutions do serve to solidify collective future aspirations, shape fixed patterns of interaction and collective action, and provide information for strategic cooperation, but their primary functio... institutions do serve to solidify collective future aspirations, shape fixed patterns of interaction and collective action, and provide information for strategic cooperation, but their primary function is not to provide gains, security, or reduce uncertainty, but to quell conflicts over the distributions of power and resources/interests. (展开)
0 有用 DerLetzteLord 2022-10-31 19:31:49 上海
institutions do serve to solidify collective future aspirations, shape fixed patterns of interaction and collective action, and provide information for strategic cooperation, but their primary functio... institutions do serve to solidify collective future aspirations, shape fixed patterns of interaction and collective action, and provide information for strategic cooperation, but their primary function is not to provide gains, security, or reduce uncertainty, but to quell conflicts over the distributions of power and resources/interests. (展开)
0 有用 功夫熊猫小碗熊 2015-02-09 09:21:45
总结现有制度理论并发展一种新的制度研究和思考路径。制度确实有利于固化集体的未来期望、塑造固定的互动和集体行动模式、提供信息促进策略性合作,但其主要功能并非提供收益、安全或减少不确定性,而是平息权力和资源/利益分配上的冲突,促成并巩固一种相对均衡的资源分配模式。制度将群体间的愿望结晶化成相对可持续和有合法性的规则、范式、规矩、法律等。权力和分配冲突再起的时候,制度变革随之发生;权力和分配相对稳定且各... 总结现有制度理论并发展一种新的制度研究和思考路径。制度确实有利于固化集体的未来期望、塑造固定的互动和集体行动模式、提供信息促进策略性合作,但其主要功能并非提供收益、安全或减少不确定性,而是平息权力和资源/利益分配上的冲突,促成并巩固一种相对均衡的资源分配模式。制度将群体间的愿望结晶化成相对可持续和有合法性的规则、范式、规矩、法律等。权力和分配冲突再起的时候,制度变革随之发生;权力和分配相对稳定且各方收益均衡的时候制度则比较有延续和稳定性。为了超越制度的功能性解释之哲学(有用故存在、存在即合理)而将制度视为了权力和分配的副产物。 (展开)
0 有用 秋江暝泊 2012-10-23 21:35:27
传承制度学派,补充了冲突、分配和权力的视角