Mythology, Madness, and Laughter

原文摘录   · · · · · ·  ( 全部 )

• Hegel’s true novelty can be seen apropos the standard designation of the post-Kantian development as forming the triad of Fichte’s ‘subjective’ idealism, Schelling’s ‘objective’ idealism, and Hegel’s ‘absolute’ idealism. The designation of Schelling’s Identitätsphilosophie as ‘objective’ idealism is, however, deceiving: the whole point of his Identitätsphilosophie is that subjective idealism (transcendental philosophy) and objective idealism (philosophy of nature) are two approaches to the Third, the Absolute beyond or beneath the duality of spirit and nature, of subject and object, underlying them both and manifesting itself in both of them. (Late Fichte does something similar when he passes from the transcendental I to the divine Being as the absolute ground of all reality.) In this sens... (查看原文)

  Walt 21 回复 8赞 2017-06-06 20:11:39

• We can thus globally discern three positions: metaphysical, transcendental, and speculative. In the first one, reality is simply perceived as existing out there, and the task of philosophy is to analyze its basic structure. In the second one, a philosopher investigates the subjective conditions of possibility of objective reality, its transcendental genesis; in the third one, subjectivity is re-inscribed into reality, but not simply reduced to a part of objective reality. That is, while the subjective constitution of reality, the split that separates the subject from the in-itself, is fully admitted, this very split is transposed back into reality as its kenotic self-emptying (to use the Christian theological term, as Hegel does). Appearance is not reduced to reality, the very process of a... (查看原文)

  Walt 21 回复 8赞 2017-06-06 20:11:39

> 全部原文摘录