It is much more difficult to read this book than reading Mankiw’s text books. This book is rich in terminology, theories and models, but it really confused me how many of these rules could be adopted in understanding the present eco-society.
C+/It may be useful for beginners but it is definitely unsuitable to advanced learners. It seems that Mr. Samuelson was trying to find a balance between introducing economics insights and presenting knowledge in an amusing way, but it works out terribly. The book shows some advanced models without sufficient explanation, which is annoying.
2 有用 cloud 2018-09-18 18:02:51
It is much more difficult to read this book than reading Mankiw’s text books. This book is rich in terminology, theories and models, but it really confused me how many of these rules could be adopted in understanding the present eco-society.
0 有用 Praeter 2013-02-16 21:35:39
JC课外书 文笔不错
0 有用 笑挺戈 2022-06-11 09:22:57
读了微观部分
0 有用 荷鲁斯之眼 2018-11-02 16:20:19
Ah, finally!
0 有用 Chris Lattner 2021-03-28 20:51:03
上课时读的,就算读完了吧。感觉相比Mankiw的课本算是比较中立的了,没夹太多私货。
0 有用 国王的新枪 2020-04-09 17:45:59
终!于!啃!完!啦!比曼昆的更抽象、更偏数理一些,不过还是相当基础的,过段时间就向中级进军
0 有用 John 2023-03-05 10:14:09 上海
@2020-12-19 15:01:00
0 有用 ToriAmos 2019-01-02 18:33:53
C+/It may be useful for beginners but it is definitely unsuitable to advanced learners. It seems that Mr. Samuelson was trying to find a balance between introducing economics insights and presenting knowledge in an amusing way, but it works out terribly. The book shows some advanced models without sufficient explanation, which is annoying.
0 有用 migrant 2023-05-02 16:37:51 江苏
4星。把第五章,宏观经济学,看完了。逻辑是明晰的,对于概念介绍也足够;但是对于逻辑的分析,啰嗦而零碎。接着阅读六七章,然后找时间来看前四章,看看读完后会有什么感受。
0 有用 江湖弱羽 2023-01-29 19:47:05 福建
阅读了微观部分,感觉一些点相比Mankiw的教材讲得更好,比如minimum wage的福利影响,和imperfect competition产生的原因和福利影响
0 有用 譬如北辰 2021-01-10 14:59:59
永远的经典。对数理不算差的我来说这本书比曼昆那本《经济学原理》更透彻、更尽兴。