To complicate matters even further, there is no fixed distinction between signifiers and signifieds either. If you want to know the meaning (or signified) of a signifier, you can look it up in the dictionary; but all you will find will be yet more signifiers, whose signifieds you can in turn look up, and so . on. The process we are discussing is not only in theory infinite but somehow circular: signifiers keep transforming into signifieds and vice versa, and you will never arrive at a final signified which is not a signifier in itself. If structuralism divided the sign from the referent, this kind of thinking often known as 'post-structuralism' goes a step further: it divides the signifier from the signified.
(页码111). (查看原文)
Another way of putting what we have just said is that meaning is not immediately present in a sign. Since the meaning of a sign is a matter of what the sign is not, its meaning is always in some sense absent from it too. Meaning, if you like, is scattered or dispersed along the whole chain of signifiers: it cannot be easily nailed down, it is never fully present in anyone sign alone, but is rather a kind of constant flickering of presence and absence together. (页码111). (查看原文)
precise and humanist. i like his comment on Freud, “his compassion for ego is a compassion for human race, labouring under the intolerable pressure of a society built on the repression and deferment ...precise and humanist. i like his comment on Freud, “his compassion for ego is a compassion for human race, labouring under the intolerable pressure of a society built on the repression and deferment of gratification.”(展开)
precise and humanist. i like his comment on Freud, “his compassion for ego is a compassion for human race, labouring under the intolerable pressure of a society built on the repression and deferment ...precise and humanist. i like his comment on Freud, “his compassion for ego is a compassion for human race, labouring under the intolerable pressure of a society built on the repression and deferment of gratification.”(展开)
![[英国] 特里·伊格尔顿](https://img3.doubanio.com/img/author/medium/public/1498191335.77.jpg)
特里·伊格尔顿 作者
Medea
北京大学出版社2007版
思郁
北京大学出版社2007版
诺基拉
北京大学出版社2007版
跳房子
北京大学出版社2007版
孟冬
北京大学出版社2007版
姬灼蕴
外语教学与研究出版社2004版
人均产量
北京大学出版社2007版
白云苍狗
北京大学出版社2007版
麦克默多的浮冰
北京大学出版社2007版
0 有用 雙木 2014-03-20 21:25:27
说是对批评的批评也好，说是对批评的结构也好，但就是不像“introduction”。每个章节的构造都差不多：某种批评，在某种时代社会条件下产生，有何种方法论，方法论中反应了如何的或保守或激进的意识形态内核，而批评本身是如何忽视这种内核，方法又是如何的无法触及到历史和社会方面，而马克思主义的社会历史批评（虽然没明说），却是以何种穿透社会的洞见凌驾于它们之上。吐槽犀利，但颇有左棍气。
0 有用 卧槽十点了 2013-07-24 14:56:08
太精彩了 目前还无法完全读懂但是真的提供了很多视角 有空一定会把afterword再读一遍
0 有用 B612星人 2011-08-29 16:58:54
读完还是感觉很夹生饭~
0 有用 少冲 2015-02-24 13:25:53
precise and humanist. i like his comment on Freud, “his compassion for ego is a compassion for human race, labouring under the intolerable pressure of a society built on the repression and deferment ... precise and humanist. i like his comment on Freud, “his compassion for ego is a compassion for human race, labouring under the intolerable pressure of a society built on the repression and deferment of gratification.” (展开)
0 有用 小四不象 2014-01-23 00:56:03
Theory is by no means interesting...phenomenology is so hard to understand.
0 有用 香炽 2022-07-12 13:24:26
真希望所有导论都能写得这么流畅、风趣、读者友好
0 有用 Ihadow 2021-02-01 20:14:05
2020
0 有用 Lucifer 2015-10-18 12:17:41
文学理论课教材 还蛮易懂的 不会太无聊
0 有用 少冲 2015-02-24 13:25:53
precise and humanist. i like his comment on Freud, “his compassion for ego is a compassion for human race, labouring under the intolerable pressure of a society built on the repression and deferment ... precise and humanist. i like his comment on Freud, “his compassion for ego is a compassion for human race, labouring under the intolerable pressure of a society built on the repression and deferment of gratification.” (展开)
0 有用 留影者 2014-05-24 09:06:22
补课