John C. Bogle shares his extensive insights on investing in mutual funds Since the first edition of Common Sense on Mutual Funds was published in 1999, much has changed, and no one is more aware of this than mutual fund pioneer John Bogle. Now, in this completely updated Second Edition, Bogle returns to take another critical look at the mutual fund industry and help inves...
John C. Bogle shares his extensive insights on investing in mutual funds Since the first edition of Common Sense on Mutual Funds was published in 1999, much has changed, and no one is more aware of this than mutual fund pioneer John Bogle. Now, in this completely updated Second Edition, Bogle returns to take another critical look at the mutual fund industry and help investors navigate their way through the staggering array of investment alternatives that are available to them. . Written in a straightforward and accessible style, this reliable resource examines the fundamentals of mutual fund investing in today's turbulent market environment and offers timeless advice in building an investment portfolio. Along the way, Bogle shows you how simplicity and common sense invariably trump costly complexity, and how a low cost, broadly diversified portfolio is virtually assured of outperforming the vast majority of Wall Street professionals over the long-term. Written by respected mutual fund industry legend John C. Bogle Discusses the timeless fundamentals of investing that apply in any type of market Reflects on the structural and regulatory changes in the mutual fund industry Other titles by Bogle: The Little Book of Common Sense Investing and Enough. Securing your financial future has never seemed more difficult, but you'll be a better investor for having read the Second Edition of Common Sense on Mutual Funds .
asdsky2000
北京联合出版公司2017版
桃之夭夭
中国人民大学出版社2011版
岑斌
中国人民大学出版社2011版
byfish
中国人民大学出版社2011版
Arete_Lz
北京联合出版公司2017版
SJL豆瓣酱
北京联合出版公司2017版
0 有用 けせん 2020-01-06 11:48:54
购买指数基金的重要性，不要被波动影响，长期定投，收益可能比主动操作要好。
0 有用 阿莱克斯 2018-01-07 08:12:39
前面还好 后面就很水了
0 有用 y2k 2014-06-20 02:43:10
概念清楚且客观，但稍嫌啰嗦。
2 有用 飞的鼠 2020-05-26 20:29:40
虽然书中不少观点有重复，尤其是指数基金和基金治理这块，但我倾向于把这些看成John Bogle对重点原则（inflexible principles）的梳理和重申。我看到有读者把这本600多页的书就总结成关于指数基金投资的几行话，这挺可惜的。因为作者还大量谈及了基金行业治理方面的结构性问题以及基金达到一定体量的困境等等。另外，作者最后花了不少笔墨提到自己创立Vanguard的过程和对企业的理解，挺... 虽然书中不少观点有重复，尤其是指数基金和基金治理这块，但我倾向于把这些看成John Bogle对重点原则（inflexible principles）的梳理和重申。我看到有读者把这本600多页的书就总结成关于指数基金投资的几行话，这挺可惜的。因为作者还大量谈及了基金行业治理方面的结构性问题以及基金达到一定体量的困境等等。另外，作者最后花了不少笔墨提到自己创立Vanguard的过程和对企业的理解，挺有趣的。语言方面，John Bogle文笔还是非常简练和朴实，没有过多的行话。可能唯一不足的是，文中用了过多了破折号，挺影响阅读的，主语拖得老长，隔了好几十个单词才找到谓语，不过这可能是他的风格或者那年代的流行写法。 (展开)
1 有用 TUTU 2020-04-08 21:53:14
很多知识点都知道，所以读起来很快。只是重复了一遍you can never beat the market