In this 2009 book, Revell examines questions of Roman ethnic identity and explores Roman imperialism as a lived experience based around the paradox of similarity and difference. Her case studies of public architecture provide an understanding of how urbanism, the emperor and religion were part of the daily encounters of these communities. Revell applies the ideas of agency and practice in her examination of the structures that held the empire together and how they were implicated within repeated daily activities. Rather than offering a homogenised 'ideal type' description of Roman cultural identity, she uses these structures as a way to understand how encounters differed between communities, thus producing a more nuanced interpretation of what it was to be Roman. Bringing an innovative approach to the problem of Romanisation, Revell breaks from traditional models, cutting across a number of entrenched debates such as arguments about the imposition of Roman culture or resistance to Roman rule.
0 有用 囤土豆的流浪猫 2024-10-29 02:53:33 爱尔兰
挑战简化的罗马化/本土主义(化)的二分,而是提出了fragmentation of Roman identities,即研究不同类型的罗马经验,指出要关注日常生活中的罗马经验与权力实践,可以看出,在帝国之内,divide et impera始终是条黄金律,利用地方的阶层差异来强化服从罗马的权力以及意识形态。不过从分析来看,作者更多指出了地方的精英如何利用罗马式的语言来强化自己在地方的权力、地位、特... 挑战简化的罗马化/本土主义(化)的二分,而是提出了fragmentation of Roman identities,即研究不同类型的罗马经验,指出要关注日常生活中的罗马经验与权力实践,可以看出,在帝国之内,divide et impera始终是条黄金律,利用地方的阶层差异来强化服从罗马的权力以及意识形态。不过从分析来看,作者更多指出了地方的精英如何利用罗马式的语言来强化自己在地方的权力、地位、特权,或者把罗马的语言变成一种表达权力的时髦语言,但是这似乎并不能推出being ethnicaly Roman的观点,即大家虽然用了这些元素,但是并不见得会有所谓的「共享的罗马族群意识」。另外,作者分析的案例主要是西部罗马,东部如Aristides则提出了罗马公民统治者/非罗马被统治者的区分。 (展开)