In this widely anticipated book, two leading contemporary art historians offer a subtle and profound reconsideration of the problem of time in the Renaissance. Alexander Nagel and Christopher Wood examine the meanings, uses, and effects of chronologies, models of temporality, and notions of originality and repetition in Renaissance images and artifacts. Anachronic Renaissance reveals a web of paths traveled by works and artists--a landscape obscured by art history's disciplinary compulsion to anchor its data securely in time. The buildings, paintings, drawings, prints, sculptures, and medals discussed were shaped by concerns about authenticity, about reference to prestigious origins and precedents, and about the implications of transposition from one medium to another. Byzantine icons taken to be Early Christian antiquities, the acheiropoieton (or "image made without hands"), the activities of spoliation and citation, differing approaches to art restoration, legends about movable buildings, and forgeries and pastiches: all of these emerge as basic conceptual structures of Renaissance art. Although a work of art does bear witness to the moment of its fabrication, Nagel and Wood argue that it is equally important to understand its temporal instability: how it points away from that moment, backward to a remote ancestral origin, to a prior artifact or image, even to an origin outside of time, in divinity. This book is not the story about the Renaissance, nor is it just a story. It imagines the infrastructure of many possible stories.
2 有用 噜 2013-11-19 06:52:10
文艺复兴时期同时出现了复制前人的作品以及标榜创新的作品,探讨艺术品所指向的多重时间。从个头来说又是一件凶器,这个学期的最后一本书了。美貌与智慧兼备的教授生病了啊,课间咳嗽得厉害
2 有用 𝑾𝒂𝒍𝒅𝒆𝒊𝒏𝒔𝒂𝒎𝒌𝒆𝒊𝒕 2022-09-11 13:24:57 江苏
盛名之下,其实难副。体例散乱,不成体统,大大弱化了开篇立下的理论野心。要说最重要的贡献嘛,大概就在于引领了“错时论”(anachronism)这个新的“学术增长点”(笑)。缩略版本:Alexander Nagel and Christopher S. Wood, "Toward a New Model of Renaissance Anachronism", in The Art Bulletin... 盛名之下,其实难副。体例散乱,不成体统,大大弱化了开篇立下的理论野心。要说最重要的贡献嘛,大概就在于引领了“错时论”(anachronism)这个新的“学术增长点”(笑)。缩略版本:Alexander Nagel and Christopher S. Wood, "Toward a New Model of Renaissance Anachronism", in The Art Bulletin, Vol. 87, No. 3 (Sep., 2005), pp. 403-415. (展开)
1 有用 felsina 2024-12-28 22:40:53 意大利
重读有收获。本书写在欧洲艺术史凭借欧陆后现代后结构等理论思潮展开新艺术史自我反思的末尾,既是某种意义上的集大成,也为某个时代画上了句号。它提出的问题意识相当尖锐,也用有点任性的概念写作把这种意识进一步戏剧化,这个问题意识完全值得在剔除了作者自创的术语套路之后,转译到非欧洲语境重新思考。作者的方法框架以欧洲语境内部的瓦尔堡复兴、贝尔廷等的图像理论和北美本土的后现代思潮/Kubler为核心坐标,它重K... 重读有收获。本书写在欧洲艺术史凭借欧陆后现代后结构等理论思潮展开新艺术史自我反思的末尾,既是某种意义上的集大成,也为某个时代画上了句号。它提出的问题意识相当尖锐,也用有点任性的概念写作把这种意识进一步戏剧化,这个问题意识完全值得在剔除了作者自创的术语套路之后,转译到非欧洲语境重新思考。作者的方法框架以欧洲语境内部的瓦尔堡复兴、贝尔廷等的图像理论和北美本土的后现代思潮/Kubler为核心坐标,它重Kubler艺术品内部的观念序列,轻物质性和社会语境论,也因此本书对时间性的思考与Trachtenberg从社会艺术史角度作出的同样受Kubler启发的论述有高度的互补性。就方法来说,本书用图像理论话语取代语境的写法在十多年后已不再是主流,学科议题也已转场。 (展开)
1 有用 hanalei 2016-04-10 22:18:54
目前我喜欢的艺术史写作,要么作者活在美国,要么埋在英国,t t
0 有用 禅茶一味 2012-01-24 14:58:06
Renaissance Orientations. Spring 2012. w/ Alexander Nagel.