In the first authoritative biography of Alexander the Great written for a general audience in a generation, classicist and historian Philip Freeman tells the remarkable life of the great conqueror. The celebrated Macedonian king has been one of the most enduring figures in history. He was a general of such skill and renown that for two thousand years other great leaders studied his strategy and tactics, from Hannibal to Napoleon, with countless more in between. He flashed across the sky of history like a comet, glowing brightly and burning out quickly: crowned at age nineteen, dead by thirty-two. He established the greatest empire of the ancient world; Greek coins and statues are found as far east as Afghanistan. Our interest in him has never faded. Alexander was born into the royal family of Macedonia, the kingdom that would soon rule over Greece. Tutored as a boy by Aristotle, Alexander had an inquisitive mind that would serve him well when he faced formidable obstacles during his military campaigns. Shortly after taking command of the army, he launched an invasion of the Persian empire, and continued his conquests as far south as the deserts of Egypt and as far east as the mountains of present-day Pakistan and the plains of India. Alexander spent nearly all his adult life away from his homeland, and he and his men helped spread the Greek language throughout western Asia, where it would become the lingua franca of the ancient world. Within a short time after Alexander’s death in Baghdad, his empire began to fracture. Best known among his successors are the Ptolemies of Egypt, whose empire lasted until Cleopatra. In his lively and authoritative biography of Alexander, classical scholar and historian Philip Freeman describes Alexander’s astonishing achievements and provides insight into the mercurial character of the great conqueror. Alexander could be petty and magnanimous, cruel and merciful, impulsive and farsighted. Above all, he was ferociously, intensely competitive and could not tolerate losing—which he rarely did. As Freeman explains, without Alexander, the influence of Greece on the ancient world would surely not have been as great as it was, even if his motivation was not to spread Greek culture for beneficial purposes but instead to unify his empire. Only a handful of people have influenced history as Alexander did, which is why he continues to fascinate us.
1 有用 浪迹天涯肖卿欣 2019-01-02 15:00:47
马其顿历史这么牛逼?一直以为是个小破国家呢,还要给他们捐校车。
1 有用 Puff 2013-12-20 07:30:04
这本书以按照亚历山大成长的时间顺序,但是每一章节却是以一个地名来作为标题,体现每个地域对这个伟人成长的影响,文笔流畅,当然有些作者的想象成分在里面。 里面有许多漂亮的引证。
0 有用 栞 2016-08-26 23:53:06
好看,文笔流畅,按照地名和时间顺序讲述了亚历山大大帝辉煌的一生。
0 有用 林菲茵 2025-06-17 11:00:27 浙江
读了这么多“大帝传”,亚历山大是最富有君子气概和仁义情怀的大帝了。按照每个地点串起亚历山大的一生,脉络清晰,加了一些作者的主观趣味,整体值得一看。
1 有用 Florianfu*kddl 2025-05-08 00:42:42 北京
以亚历山大征战地为线索生动描绘其生平的著作。作者组织史料和进行连贯的历史叙事的能力十分突出,但也存在三个明显问题:第一,可能是出于趣味性的考虑,作者添加了大量无关紧要的乐子片段和自己揣测的心理活动,这样的叙述方式十分考验作者平衡“历史”和“叙事”之轻重的能力,处理不好容易使得历史事件的归因导向纯粹的偶然,相较之下Edmund Wilson的Finland Station在这方面明显更富有经验。第二... 以亚历山大征战地为线索生动描绘其生平的著作。作者组织史料和进行连贯的历史叙事的能力十分突出,但也存在三个明显问题:第一,可能是出于趣味性的考虑,作者添加了大量无关紧要的乐子片段和自己揣测的心理活动,这样的叙述方式十分考验作者平衡“历史”和“叙事”之轻重的能力,处理不好容易使得历史事件的归因导向纯粹的偶然,相较之下Edmund Wilson的Finland Station在这方面明显更富有经验。第二,对具体战役的描绘有明显的叙述混乱,例如对马其顿战阵的描写过于简略,此外还有许多战役描写细节过少,容易显得儿戏。第三,可能由于涉及到的地理方位过多,作者也难免出现较为严重的bug,尤其是chap.9同其大量参考的Arrianus的直接冲突。此外即便从故事性上看,亚历山大人物形象的刻画也难说成功。 (展开)