In this first English translation of his work, Laruelle explores the major European thinkers from Nietzsche to Derrida to define his own 'non-philosophical' project. A crucial text in the development of Francois Laruelle's oeuvre and an excellent starting point for understanding his broader project, "Philosophies of Difference" offers a theoretical and critical analysis of the philosophers of difference after Hegel and Nietzsche. Laruelle then uses this analysis to introduce a new theoretical practice of non-philosophical thought. Rather than presenting a narrative historical overview, Laruelle provides a series of rigorous critiques of the various interpretations of difference in Hegel, Nietzsche and Deleuze, Heidegger and Derrida. From Laruelle's innovative theoretical perspective, the forms of philosophical difference that emerge appear as variations upon a unique, highly abstract structure of philosophical decision, the self-posing and self-legitimating essence of philosophy itself. Reconceived in terms of philosophical decision, the seemingly radical concept of philosophical difference is shown to configure rather the identity of philosophy as such, which thus becomes manifest as a contingent and no longer absolute form of thinking. The way is thereby opened for initiating a new form of thought, anticipated here with the development of a key notion of non-philosophy, the Vision-in-One.
5 有用 非行少女神乃襞 2021-03-07 15:49:39
差异哲学的根本问题就在于其超越论的同义反复结构(Difference-in-itself,without-without-without),这种结构以一种悖论混合或交织的形式(纯粹的不纯物)掩盖了单向的二元性的交叠状态,或许我们可以这么说,大一就是The Without of Without-without-without,而我们无法去问Which one?因为这一提问的假定是,大一真的可以被差异... 差异哲学的根本问题就在于其超越论的同义反复结构(Difference-in-itself,without-without-without),这种结构以一种悖论混合或交织的形式(纯粹的不纯物)掩盖了单向的二元性的交叠状态,或许我们可以这么说,大一就是The Without of Without-without-without,而我们无法去问Which one?因为这一提问的假定是,大一真的可以被差异的逻辑耗尽。扣一星是感觉翻译真的有点问题,拉鲁埃的行文虽然晦涩但可读性绝对没有这么差…… (展开)
2 有用 新鲜海捕鱿鱼 2024-10-02 00:49:43 瑞典
翻过,内容挺好的,就是写作不像真人,所以就(遵循拉鲁埃自己的建议)只看了几章。大致了解一点拉鲁埃对二十世纪哲学辩证法的识别之后,每个人都能自己实践这种眼光,而不必关心拉鲁埃自己(与梅亚苏的庸俗方案同构的)的生草解决方案。说到底,问题不仅是对哲学辩证法的“非”总是成为新的哲学,而是说这个辩证法的谜底是作为行业的思考本身。 速通建议:直接读The three stages of difference和... 翻过,内容挺好的,就是写作不像真人,所以就(遵循拉鲁埃自己的建议)只看了几章。大致了解一点拉鲁埃对二十世纪哲学辩证法的识别之后,每个人都能自己实践这种眼光,而不必关心拉鲁埃自己(与梅亚苏的庸俗方案同构的)的生草解决方案。说到底,问题不仅是对哲学辩证法的“非”总是成为新的哲学,而是说这个辩证法的谜底是作为行业的思考本身。 速通建议:直接读The three stages of difference和The powerlessness to think individuals and multiplicities两节。理解拉鲁埃,或者至少理解他反对的东西其实毫无困难,一种超验-经验之间的反相关主义。 (展开)
0 有用 酸 2025-10-21 19:39:09 湖北
黑格尔无疑也是差异决断之一种。特别好,彻底转粉