Before Columbus's fateful voyage in 1492, no European had ever seen, much less tasted, tobacco or chocolate. Initially dismissed as dry leaves and an odd Indian drink, these two commodities came to conquer Europe on a scale unsurpassed by any other American resource or product. A fascinating story of contact, exploration, and exchange in the Atlantic world, Sacred Gifts, Profane Pleasures traces the ways in which these two goods of the Americas both changed and were changed by Europe.
Focusing on the Spanish Empire, Marcy Norton investigates how tobacco and chocolate became material and symbolic links to the pre-Hispanic past for colonized Indians and colonizing Europeans alike. Botanical ambassadors of the American continent, they also profoundly affected Europe. Tobacco, once condemned as proof of Indian diabolism, became the constant companion of clergymen and the single largest source of state revenue in Spain. Before coffee or tea became popular in Europe, chocolate was the drink that energized the fatigued and uplifted the depressed. However, no one could quite forget the pagan past of tobacco and chocolate, despite their apparent Europeanization: physicians relied on Mesoamerican medical systems for their understanding of tobacco; theologians looked to Aztec precedent to decide whether chocolate drinking violated Lenten fasts.
The struggle of scientists, theologians, and aficionados alike to reconcile notions of European superiority with the fact of American influence shaped key modern developments ranging from natural history to secularization. Norton considers the material, social, and cultural interaction between Europe and the Americas with historical depth and insight that goes beyond the portrayal of Columbian exchange simply as a matter of exploitation, infection, and conquest.
1 有用 H. Zhou 2023-01-22 05:02:03 加拿大
读完并没有感觉到什么特殊的…本书核心讨论的是“syncretism”,论点是要在针对这两种介质的“生物/文化决定论”中探寻其中没有那么极端的部分,尤其针锋相对地指出欧洲人在自己批量使用可可烟草时是效仿了美洲原住民的方式。然而我觉得这论点实质上是一种逻辑应然:即便大家都忽视了这一点,不效仿原住民如何在未知的东西中找到价值?总体来说,作者尽力在展现殖民地和宗主国内各自的dynamics,以可可烟草为引... 读完并没有感觉到什么特殊的…本书核心讨论的是“syncretism”,论点是要在针对这两种介质的“生物/文化决定论”中探寻其中没有那么极端的部分,尤其针锋相对地指出欧洲人在自己批量使用可可烟草时是效仿了美洲原住民的方式。然而我觉得这论点实质上是一种逻辑应然:即便大家都忽视了这一点,不效仿原住民如何在未知的东西中找到价值?总体来说,作者尽力在展现殖民地和宗主国内各自的dynamics,以可可烟草为引子看各种族群如何根据它们寻找意义价值,甚至引到了“世俗化”和现代国家诞生这些看似毫不相干的问题。然而可可烟草真的就起了那么大的作用吗?还是说它们不过是这些变化过程中的一环呢?从这些问题延展来看,本书似乎核心的东西也就是一种视角了吧。 (展开)