Life is one of our most basic concepts, yet when examined directly it proves remarkably contradictory and elusive, encompassing both the broadest and the most specific phenomena. We can see this uncertainty about life in our habit of approaching it as something at once scientific and mystical, in the return of vitalisms of all types, and in the pervasive politicization of life. In short, life seems everywhere at stake and yet is nowhere the same. In "After Life", Eugene Thacker clears the ground for a new philosophy of life by recovering the twists and turns in its philosophical history. Beginning with Aristotle's originary formulation of a philosophy of life, Thacker examines the influence of Aristotle's ideas in medieval and early modern thought, leading him to the work of Immanuel Kant, who notes the inherently contradictory nature of 'life in itself'. Along the way, Thacker shows how early modern philosophy's engagement with the problem of life affects thinkers such as Gilles Deleuze, Georges Bataille, and Alain Badiou, as well as contemporary developments in the 'speculative turn' in philosophy. At a time when life is categorized, measured, and exploited in a variety of ways, "After Life" invites us to delve deeper into the contours and contradictions of the age-old question, 'what is life?'
1 有用 Dick Land 2023-08-26 12:14:01 广东
生命这个概念充满了多重指涉,我们不断的对生命进行概念化,将它建构为为我所的东西,我们要对这种生命概念进行一种非人本主义的批判
3 有用 Sant 2020-10-21 16:43:05
univocity
1 有用 R 2024-03-03 05:36:02 美国
3.5;有启发,谈朱熹的时候颇怪
2 有用 夺铎堕𖤓 2021-07-12 17:09:31
!!!
0 有用 可溶化的魚 2025-11-09 19:13:50 湖北
萨克的贡献在于揭示了“生命”概念背后的神学残余(theological residue)——即使在看似“世俗”的科学话语中,“生命”仍承载着某种神圣性。例如,生物伦理学中对“生命神圣不可侵犯”的强调实则是神学话语的世俗化转译。虽然他试图超越阿甘本的悲观框架,提出“非人的生命”(impersonal life)作为另类可能——这种生命不是个体化的、政治化的主体,而是一种匿名的、宇宙性的流变,接近德勒... 萨克的贡献在于揭示了“生命”概念背后的神学残余(theological residue)——即使在看似“世俗”的科学话语中,“生命”仍承载着某种神圣性。例如,生物伦理学中对“生命神圣不可侵犯”的强调实则是神学话语的世俗化转译。虽然他试图超越阿甘本的悲观框架,提出“非人的生命”(impersonal life)作为另类可能——这种生命不是个体化的、政治化的主体,而是一种匿名的、宇宙性的流变,接近德勒兹的“内在性平面”(plane of immanence);它拒绝被还原为个体、物种或生态系统,而是一种弥漫的、非中心的“生命-力”(life-force)——但其在转向文学(如爱伦·坡、洛夫克拉夫特)和神秘主义文本的同时也导致了政治行动力的瘫痪,陷入晦涩与不可通约性。 (展开)