Translated by CAROLYN SHREAD In the post-feminist age the fact that ‘woman' finds herself deprived of her ‘essence' only confirms, paradoxically, a very ancient state of affairs: ‘woman' has never been able to define herself in any other way than in terms of the violence done to her. Violence alone confers her being - whether it is domestic and social violence or theoretical violence. The critique of ‘essentialism' (i.e. there is no specifically feminine essence) proposed by both gender theory and deconstruction is just one more twist in the ontological negation of the feminine. Contrary to all expectations, however, this ever more radical hollowing out of woman within intellectual movements supposed to protect her, this assimilation of woman to a ‘being nothing', clears the way for a new beginning. Let us now assume the thought of ‘woman' as an empty but resistant essence, an essence that is resistant precisely because it is empty, a resistance that strikes down the impossibility of its own disappearance once and for all. To ask what remains of woman after the sacrifice of her being is to signal a new era in the feminist struggle, changing the terms of the battle to go beyond both essentialism and anti-essentialism. In this path-breaking work Catherine Malabou begins with philosophy, asking: what is the life of a woman philosopher?
0 有用 zuzuzuzu 2023-02-22 23:05:00 上海
讲述了作者如何通过可塑性摆脱与哲学和德里达虐恋情深的故事。《“女性”的意义》一篇蛮好,论述了“存在论之变/交换”(ontological ex/change)用来取替性/存在论差异(sexual/ontological difference)的必要性。在“可替换性”(substitutability)的意义上,马拉布是巴特勒早期和晚期作品之间的和解:马拉布在存在论上证明了巴特勒可能缺乏的东西!
0 有用 Penumbra 2024-02-06 04:45:18 加拿大
很好 概念不明觉厉 // wonder和vulva那部分很有趣 但好像就是Irigaray的观点 不是特别新 // 上完课还是不太懂怎么个叫plasticising writing Malabou理解的writing到底是个啥 epoch of plasticity又是个啥