My standpoint is that of a working historian practising in the third quarter of the twentieth century. To many readers it will seem that I have done poorly by such philosophical writers as Hegel and Croce. Frankly, neither of these famous philosophers mean much to me as a historian, and I have thought it best to admit this openly. (查看原文)
0 有用 野次馬 2012-10-20 18:16:54
就历史本质而言持论尤为公允，Preface很见作者正统著史者立场。后文提到诸多史家虽说大部分时候不露褒贬，大致取向尚能揣测。全书章节分布颇为奇怪，倒数第二章像是跑错了片场，第五章夹在三章史学史中间也很是尴尬。作者很尽心地履行着知人论世的准则，是以总结时代主流和异响时不遗余力。
0 有用 野次馬 2012-10-20 18:16:54
就历史本质而言持论尤为公允，Preface很见作者正统著史者立场。后文提到诸多史家虽说大部分时候不露褒贬，大致取向尚能揣测。全书章节分布颇为奇怪，倒数第二章像是跑错了片场，第五章夹在三章史学史中间也很是尴尬。作者很尽心地履行着知人论世的准则，是以总结时代主流和异响时不遗余力。