This study of the regulation of sexuality in the Qing dynasty explores the social context for sexual behavior criminalized by the state, arguing that the eighteenth century in China was a time of profound change in sexual matters. During this time, the basic organizing principle for state regulation of sexuality shifted away from status, under which members of different groups ...
This study of the regulation of sexuality in the Qing dynasty explores the social context for sexual behavior criminalized by the state, arguing that the eighteenth century in China was a time of profound change in sexual matters. During this time, the basic organizing principle for state regulation of sexuality shifted away from status, under which members of different groups had long been held to distinct standards of familial and sexual morality. In its place, a new regime of gender mandated a uniform standard of sexual morality and criminal liability across status boundaries—all people were expected to conform to gender roles defined in terms of marriage.
This shift in the regulation of sexuality, manifested in official treatment of charges of adultery, rape, sodomy, widow chastity, and prostitution, represented the imperial state’s efforts to cope with disturbing social and demographic changes. Anachronistic status categories were discarded to accommodate a more fluid social structure, and the state initiated new efforts to enforce rigid gender roles and thus to shore up the peasant family against a swelling underclass of single, rogue males outside the family system. These men were demonized as sexual predators who threatened the chaste wives and daughters (and the young sons) of respectable households, and a flood of new legislation targeted them for suppression.
In addition to presenting official and judicial actions regarding sexuality, the book tells the story of people excluded from accepted patterns of marriage and household who bonded with each other in unorthodox ways (combining sexual union with resource pooling and fictive kinship) to satisfy a range of human needs. This previously invisible dimension of Qing social practice is brought into sharp focus by the testimony, gleaned from local and central court archives, of such marginalized people as peasants, laborers, and beggars.
Sex, Law, and Society in Late Imperial China的创作者
· · · · · ·
《中华帝国晚期的性、法律和社会》(Sex, Law, and Society in Late Imperial China),是美国学者苏成捷(Matthew H. Sommer)的一部得到广泛好评的著作。书中,苏成捷广征博引,运用了从汉代至清代的大量法律史文献(以清代中央和地方档案为主),分析了清代对待性犯罪的法制...
(展开)
2023年5月,广西师范大学出版社出版了《中华帝国晚期的性、法律与社会》,本书是美国斯坦福大学历史系苏成捷(Matthew H. Sommer)教授2000年在斯坦福大学出版社出版的英文学术专著Sex, Law, and Society in Late Imperial China的中译本,由斯坦福大学历史学博士谢美裕女士和...
(展开)
0 有用 egg-white 2015-10-04 05:29:34
很好 第一次喜歡歷史書…
0 有用 惘随 2017-04-12 14:20:42
靠谱。
54 有用 柳无益 2020-06-27 20:56:29
中译本读完(初审)了,哈哈。走出版社三审流程中,努力,能否出版看天意。
5 有用 本杰明·海瑟薇 2020-11-02 01:11:42
总之,中国人对性方面的法律观与性本身无关,“奸”和“淫”在汉语里都有着超越性行为的含义。通奸犯法是因为破坏了父权制家庭秩序,强奸犯法是因为打破了丈夫对妻子的性专断和儒家伦理,鸡奸犯法是因为挑战了中国古代的性别秩序,卖淫嫖娼犯法是因为违背了清政府的“教化”使命。所以别说什么中国人性教育匮乏了,因为这和sex根本不是一回事儿。
0 有用 murmur 2018-04-27 04:27:02
"the threat of penetration out of place"