The Politics of Aesthetics rethinks the relationship between art and politics, reclaiming "aesthetics" from the narrow confines it is often reduced to. Jacques Rancière reveals its intrinsic link to politics by analysing what they both have in common: the delimitation of the visible and the invisible, the audible and the inaudible, the thinkable and the unthinkable, the possibl...
The Politics of Aesthetics rethinks the relationship between art and politics, reclaiming "aesthetics" from the narrow confines it is often reduced to. Jacques Rancière reveals its intrinsic link to politics by analysing what they both have in common: the delimitation of the visible and the invisible, the audible and the inaudible, the thinkable and the unthinkable, the possible and the impossible. Presented as a set of inter-linked interviews, The Politics of Aesthetics provides the most comprehensive introduction to Rancière's work to date, ranging across the history of art and politics from the Greek polis to the aesthetic revolution of the modern age.
Available now in the Bloomsbury Classics series 10 years after its original publication, The Politics of Aesthetics includes an afterword by Slavoj Zizek, an interview for the English edition, a glossary of technical terms and an extensive bibliography.
Jacques Rancière taught at the University of Paris VIII, France, from 1969 to 2000, occupying the Chair of Aesthetics and Politics from 1990 until his retirement.
Gabriel Rockhill is Assistant Professor of Philosophy at Villanova University, USA. He also teaches at the Centre Parisien d'Etudes Critiques and the Collège International de Philosophie, France. He is the author of L...
Jacques Rancière taught at the University of Paris VIII, France, from 1969 to 2000, occupying the Chair of Aesthetics and Politics from 1990 until his retirement.
Gabriel Rockhill is Assistant Professor of Philosophy at Villanova University, USA. He also teaches at the Centre Parisien d'Etudes Critiques and the Collège International de Philosophie, France. He is the author of Logique de l'histoire: Pour une analytique des pratiques philosophiques (Editions Hermann, 2010) and Pour un historicisme radical: Entre esthétique et politique avec Rancière (Editions du Sandre, forthcoming).
原文摘录
· · · · · ·
Photography was not established as an art on the grounds of its technological nature. The discourse on the originality of photography as an ‘indexical’ art is very recent, and it is less a part of the history of photography than of the history of the postmodern reversal touched upon above. Furthermore, photography did not become an art by imitating the mannerisms of art. Benjamin accurately demonstrated this regarding David Octavius Hill: it is with the little anonymous fishwife from New Haven, not with his grand pictorial compositions, that he brought photography into the world of art. Likewise, it is not the ethereal subject matter and soft focus of pictorialism that secured the status of photographic art, it is rather the appropriation of the commonplace: the emigrants in Stieglit... (查看原文)
Here we have three ways of distributing the sensible that structure the manner in which the arts can be perceived and thought of as forms of art and as forms that inscribe a sense of community: the surface of 'depicted' signs, the split reality of the theatre, the rhythm of a dancing chorus. These forms define the way in which works of art or performances are 'involved in politics', whatever may otherwise be the guiding intentions, artists' social modes of integration, or the manner in which artistic forms reflect social structures or movements. (查看原文)
Nous sommes étonnés de constater que le philosophe Jacques Rancière s'attarde à des thèmes pas vraiment utiles pour la communauté concernée ou qui n'alimentent pas la situation actuelle de crise, de médiocratie, ou de politique culturelle autoritair...
(展开)
![[法] 雅克·朗西埃](https://img1.doubanio.com/img/author/medium/public/1498126141.89.jpg)
雅克·朗西埃 作者
Levis
Bloomsbury Academic2006版
达立
La Fabrique2000版
2 有用 诡谲 2020-12-10 19:57:08
重点在对三种审美体制的整理论述，可以和《审美中的不满》《被解放的观众》《歧义》《无知的大师》《哲学家与他的穷人们》放在一起组成朗西埃政治美学的完整论述
0 有用 椎名果园 2022-03-26 15:01:41
很有用 很优美 谢谢朗西埃
0 有用 木山水 2023-02-23 23:56:59 英国
Cardinal work. 由Plato对美三种形式的区分出发，引入community，引入visibility，厘清对媒介、social power、modernity的重新划定。Well-worded in clarity and literariness.
0 有用 刘北托 2020-03-30 04:56:15
Way too expensive for an introduction and how is this a book?
0 有用 Walt 2015-12-04 17:20:21
蓝老师发在微盘了 这版好
0 有用 木山水 2023-02-23 23:56:59 英国
Cardinal work. 由Plato对美三种形式的区分出发，引入community，引入visibility，厘清对媒介、social power、modernity的重新划定。Well-worded in clarity and literariness.
0 有用 椎名果园 2022-03-26 15:01:41
很有用 很优美 谢谢朗西埃
0 有用 Vergängnis 2021-11-30 21:25:16
没有艺术的政治，不关心介入艺术，只有politics of aesthetics。理论家站在场内，作品的效应不是直接的，是内在世界知觉、描绘、解释的异构，去解开它，同时也创造另一种方式开解，就是美学的政治，瞥见新世界的开端！
0 有用 Ἴκαρος 2021-09-29 23:38:08
md最恨不说人话的人（x）是译本太差了吗，我觉得不make sense啊…书名倒是唬人，其实没讲啥东西，可能还是得先看Dissensus…
0 有用 Bricoleur 2021-07-31 18:38:25
论证材料缺少一些惊喜或者颠覆性的认识