作者:
Samuel L. Popkin 出版社: University of California Press 副标题: The Political Economy of Rural Society in Vietnam 出版年: 1979-6-11 页数: 332 定价: USD 31.95 装帧: Paperback ISBN: 9780520039544
Popkin develops a model of rational peasant behavior and shows how village procedures result from the self-interested interactions of peasants. This political economy view of peasant behavior stands in contrast to the model of a distinctive peasant moral economy in which the village community is primarily responsible for ensuring the welfare of its members.
作者简介
· · · · · ·
Samuel L. Popkin
Professor of Political Science
Ph.D., MIT, 1969
Voting Behavior, Political Economy, Comparative Politics
Popkin has published in unusually diverse areas. His most recent book is The Candidate: What it Takes to Win (and Hold) the White House. Earlier he authored The Reasoning Voter: Communication and Persuasion in Presidential Campaigns ; co-authored Issues and...
Voting Behavior, Political Economy, Comparative Politics
Popkin has published in unusually diverse areas. His most recent book is The Candidate: What it Takes to Win (and Hold) the White House. Earlier he authored The Reasoning Voter: Communication and Persuasion in Presidential Campaigns ; co-authored Issues and Strategies: The Computer Simulation of Presidential Campaigns; and he co-edited Chief of Staff: Twenty-Five Years of Managing the Presidency. He is equally well known for his work on peasant society, with particular reference to East and Southeast Asia, including The Rational Peasant: The Political Economy of Rural Society in Vietnam. Popkin has also been a consulting analyst in presidential campaigns, serving as consultant to the Clinton campaign on polling and strategy, to the CBS News election units from 1983 to 1990 on survey design and analysis, and more recently to the Gore campaign. He has also served as consultant to political parties in Canada and Europe and to the Departments of State and Defense. His current research focuses on presidential campaigns and the relationship of public opinion to foreign policy.
原文摘录
· · · · · ·
In response to such views, Gourou warned against any tampering with the corporate villages. He was well aware of the inequality and venality, but admired the way that Vietnamese peasants were integrated into their villages. There was a "strict tyranny", to be sure, but the village was still a community. To alter the village, he argued, would deprive the peasants of what little happiness they had. Not everyone who worked with Gourou felt that the peasant would be best served by preserving the traditional village. After several years in the villages with Gourou, one of his research assistants became convinced that drastic change, both economic and political, was needed to improve the lot of the peasantry. His name was Vo Nguyen Giap. (查看原文)
Many peasant movements are a reflection of the peasants’ growing ability to organize and struggle for rights and privileges previously denied them. Peasant struggles are frequently battles to tame mar...Many peasant movements are a reflection of the peasants’ growing ability to organize and struggle for rights and privileges previously denied them. Peasant struggles are frequently battles to tame markets and bureaucracies, not movements to restore traditional systems.(展开)
4 有用 功夫熊猫小碗熊 2014-11-07 13:41:07
斯波论战名动一时，但通读可知两人不自觉地讨论了完全不同的问题：斯氏关注殖民时代国家推展市场和现代化时腐蚀村落的生活有机共同体和冲击旧道义纽带而激起怀旧式反抗，形成道义与危机的循环；波氏则描绘前殖民和殖民时代行政村落内形成的不完备风险对抗、福利和公共设施环境所造成的农民个人冲动被共党及地方宗教采为资源，以政治经济手段有组织解决集体行动困境，发起有组织对抗国家体制并构建新民族国家的前瞻革命。两者可比较... 斯波论战名动一时，但通读可知两人不自觉地讨论了完全不同的问题：斯氏关注殖民时代国家推展市场和现代化时腐蚀村落的生活有机共同体和冲击旧道义纽带而激起怀旧式反抗，形成道义与危机的循环；波氏则描绘前殖民和殖民时代行政村落内形成的不完备风险对抗、福利和公共设施环境所造成的农民个人冲动被共党及地方宗教采为资源，以政治经济手段有组织解决集体行动困境，发起有组织对抗国家体制并构建新民族国家的前瞻革命。两者可比较的顶多是前殖民和殖民时代，后殖民时期由于各地管理手段不一、相对和平与战争条件不同、成型组织间政治军事对抗凸显集体行动问题、国家建构进展等一系列变化，需要关注传统组织破坏与重构方可作比较。波氏顶多可批判道义经济视角的随意推广化，但他自己的个人理性—政治经济视角很难说否定了前者的意义，相互补充完全可能。 (展开)
3 有用 梗帝 2020-02-19 16:23:25
给一本学术著作五星，不代表说的全对，而是有相当的参考价值。波普金完善了舒尔茨的理论，生成了“理性小农”学派的核心观点，为后人进一步研究打下了坚实的基础。在这里不得不再次感叹新古典令人赞叹的自洽性，只要假设对了，全程就是严丝合缝的论证，真是连根针都插不进去hhh；不过还是那句话，假设对吗？我在读舒尔茨时感觉理性小农不等于理性人小农，在这本书中我的感受加深了。可以说，小农是理性的，但新古典理论中的小农... 给一本学术著作五星，不代表说的全对，而是有相当的参考价值。波普金完善了舒尔茨的理论，生成了“理性小农”学派的核心观点，为后人进一步研究打下了坚实的基础。在这里不得不再次感叹新古典令人赞叹的自洽性，只要假设对了，全程就是严丝合缝的论证，真是连根针都插不进去hhh；不过还是那句话，假设对吗？我在读舒尔茨时感觉理性小农不等于理性人小农，在这本书中我的感受加深了。可以说，小农是理性的，但新古典理论中的小农是经济理性的，理性与经济理性之间的差距在哪里？谁搞明白了这个问题，谁就抓住了农民问题的金钥匙。 (展开)
0 有用 Janus 2017-03-17 11:53:07
只读了一遍，村庄如何回应来自外部的制度变化的压力，一些细节非常精彩。
0 有用 欧罗巴流浪者 2022-03-30 10:17:06
终于借着写发展经济学作业把它给读了
0 有用 ❌🐦 2022-11-23 18:01:04 北京
竟然没有中译……
0 有用 虚一而静 2023-09-07 13:41:50 美国
Understanding Peasant China对the Moral Debate的分析很到位。
0 有用 ❌🐦 2022-11-23 18:01:04 北京
竟然没有中译……
0 有用 欧罗巴流浪者 2022-03-30 10:17:06
终于借着写发展经济学作业把它给读了
0 有用 酷酷功仔 2022-01-30 22:06:32
Many peasant movements are a reflection of the peasants’ growing ability to organize and struggle for rights and privileges previously denied them. Peasant struggles are frequently battles to tame mar... Many peasant movements are a reflection of the peasants’ growing ability to organize and struggle for rights and privileges previously denied them. Peasant struggles are frequently battles to tame markets and bureaucracies, not movements to restore traditional systems. (展开)
3 有用 梗帝 2020-02-19 16:23:25
给一本学术著作五星，不代表说的全对，而是有相当的参考价值。波普金完善了舒尔茨的理论，生成了“理性小农”学派的核心观点，为后人进一步研究打下了坚实的基础。在这里不得不再次感叹新古典令人赞叹的自洽性，只要假设对了，全程就是严丝合缝的论证，真是连根针都插不进去hhh；不过还是那句话，假设对吗？我在读舒尔茨时感觉理性小农不等于理性人小农，在这本书中我的感受加深了。可以说，小农是理性的，但新古典理论中的小农... 给一本学术著作五星，不代表说的全对，而是有相当的参考价值。波普金完善了舒尔茨的理论，生成了“理性小农”学派的核心观点，为后人进一步研究打下了坚实的基础。在这里不得不再次感叹新古典令人赞叹的自洽性，只要假设对了，全程就是严丝合缝的论证，真是连根针都插不进去hhh；不过还是那句话，假设对吗？我在读舒尔茨时感觉理性小农不等于理性人小农，在这本书中我的感受加深了。可以说，小农是理性的，但新古典理论中的小农是经济理性的，理性与经济理性之间的差距在哪里？谁搞明白了这个问题，谁就抓住了农民问题的金钥匙。 (展开)