出版社: Johns Hopkins University Press
副标题: Southern Europe, South America, and Post-Communist Europe
出版年: 1996-8-8
页数: 504
定价: USD 28.00
装帧: Paperback
ISBN: 9780801851582
内容简介 · · · · · ·
Since their classic volume The Breakdown of Democratic Regimes was published in 1978, Juan J. Linz and Alfred Stepan have increasingly focused on the questions of how, in the modern world, nondemocratic regimes can be eroded and democratic regimes crafted. In Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation, they break new ground in numerous areas. They reconceptualize the m...
Since their classic volume The Breakdown of Democratic Regimes was published in 1978, Juan J. Linz and Alfred Stepan have increasingly focused on the questions of how, in the modern world, nondemocratic regimes can be eroded and democratic regimes crafted. In Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation, they break new ground in numerous areas. They reconceptualize the major types of modern nondemocratic regimes and point out for each type the available paths to democratic transition and the tasks of democratic consolidation. They argue that, although "nation-state" and "democracy" often have conflicting logics, multiple and complementary political identities are feasible under a common roof of state-guaranteed rights. They also illustrate how, without an effective state, there can be neither effective citizenship nor successful privatization. Further, they provide criteria and evidence for politicians and scholars alike to distinguish between democratic consolidation and pseudo-democratization, and they present conceptually driven survey data for the fourteen countries studied.
Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation contains the first systematic comparative analysis of the process of democratic consolidation in southern Europe and the southern cone of South America, and it is the first book to ground post-Communist Europe within the literature of comparative politics and democratic theory.
作者简介 · · · · · ·
Juan José Linz (24 December 1926 – 1 October 2013) was a Spanish sociologist and political scientist. He was Sterling Professor Emeritus of Political Science at Yale University and an honorary member of the Scientific Council at the Juan March Institute. He is best known for his theories on totalitarian and authoritarian systems of government.
Linz was born in Bonn, Germany. In...
Juan José Linz (24 December 1926 – 1 October 2013) was a Spanish sociologist and political scientist. He was Sterling Professor Emeritus of Political Science at Yale University and an honorary member of the Scientific Council at the Juan March Institute. He is best known for his theories on totalitarian and authoritarian systems of government.
Linz was born in Bonn, Germany. In addition to his work on systems of government, he did extensive research on the breakdowns of democracy and the transition back to a democratic regime. He is the author of many works on the subject, including Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and Post-Communist Europe (Johns Hopkins University Press, 1996, co-authored with Alfred Stepan), his seminal work Totalitarian and Authoritarian Regimes (Rienner, 2000) and his influential essay 'The Perils of Presidentialism'.
Alfred Stepan is Wallace Sayre Professor of Government, the founding Director of the Center for the Study of Democracy, Toleration, and Religion (CDTR), and the Co-Director of the Institute for Religion, Culture, and Public Life (IRCPL). In 2012 he was the recipient of the Karl Deutsch Award of the International Political Science Association. The last three recipients of this award were Juan J. Linz (2003), Charles Tilly (2006), and Giovanni Sartori (2009).
Previously, Stepan was the founding Rector and President of Central European University in Budapest, Prague, and Warsaw, the former Director of the Concilium on International and Area Studies at Yale University, and Dean of the School of International Affairs at Columbia University. Stepan was also Gladstone Professor of Government at the University of Oxford and a Fellow Of All Souls College, Oxford.
Stepan's teaching and research interests include comparative politics, theories of democratic transitions, federalism, and the world's religious systems and democracy. In recent years, Stepan has conducted field research in Indonesia, Sri Lanka, Burma, Egypt, Tunisia, India, Brazil, Israel, and Palestine, among other countries. Stepan’s publications in the last three years include Crafting State Nations: India and Other Multinational Democracies, with Juan J. Linz and Yogendra Yadav; “Comparative Perspectives on Inequality and the Quality of Democracy in the United States” with Juan J. Linz in Perspectives on Politics (December 2011); “Tunisia’s Transition and the Twin Tolerations” in Journal of Democracy (April 2012); ““Rituals of Respect: Sufis and Secularists in Senegal in Comparative Perspective” in Comparative Politics (July 2012) “ Democratization Theory and the ‘Arab Spring’”, Journal of Democracy ( April 2013), (with Linz), “Democratic Parliamentary Monarchies, ” Journal of Democracy ( April 2014), ( with Linz and Minoves),and the co-editorship of Democracy& Islam in Indonesia (with Mirjam Künkler), Boundaries of Toleration ( with Charles Taylor), and Democracy, Islam and Secularism: Turkey in Comparative Perspective ( with Ahmet Kuru).
Some of his other books include Arguing Comparative Politics (Oxford 2001);Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and Post-Communist Europe, with J. J. Linz (Johns Hopkins 1996);Rethinking Military Politics: Brazil and the Southern Cone (Princeton 1988); The Breakdown of Democratic Regimes, edited with Juan J. Linz (Johns Hopkins 1978); The State and Society: Peru in Comparative Perspective(Princeton 1978); and The Military in Politics: Changing Patterns in Brazil(Princeton 1971).
喜欢读"Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation"的人也喜欢 · · · · · ·
Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation的书评 · · · · · · ( 全部 12 条 )
《民主转型与巩固的问题》
噢,民主,你这该死的家伙
尝试应用:爱沙尼亚的民主转型与巩固
这篇书评可能有关键情节透露
这篇文章其实是想应用本书的理论,然而其实对波罗的海三国的民主转型,笔者有一些不太一样的看法,请指正! 一、民主转型与巩固的理论框架 民主化指的是从其他政权形态转变成民主政权的过程,如果从民主政权转变为非民主政权,则成为民主崩溃。普沃斯基提出民主是不确定性的,... (展开)政治家是动员希望和不满的专家
民主的实际效力与理论建设之间的矛盾,别陷入民主乌托邦
伊比利亚民主转型的比较
两个因变量:完整的民主转型和巩固的民主
这篇书评可能有关键情节透露
重点看的章节: 一、初始政体类型对转型路径及巩固目标的影响 五、行动者和情境 十、具有风险的巩固民主——乌拉圭 十三、不完整的转型/接近巩固:智利 两个因变量:完整的民主转型和巩固的民主。 论证的观点:为什么民主需要5个相互关联的条件才能得以巩固,是如何巩固的。 条... (展开)转型甚难,何谈巩固?
> 更多书评 12篇
论坛 · · · · · ·
在这本书的论坛里发言这本书的其他版本 · · · · · · ( 全部3 )
-
浙江人民出版社 (2008)8.9分 486人读过
-
以下书单推荐 · · · · · · ( 全部 )
- Juan Linz (VIctor Cheng)
- 比较政治学/历史政治学/历史社会学 (皇甫杰)
- 法学nerd的偏冷读书世界 (李初一)
- politic (Belle Epoque)
- 特别想读英文版的 (井底之蛙往上爬)
谁读这本书? · · · · · ·
二手市场
· · · · · ·
- 在豆瓣转让 有253人想读,手里有一本闲着?
订阅关于Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation的评论:
feed: rss 2.0
11 有用 功夫熊猫小碗熊 2015-03-26 10:20:34
封面惊悚。经验材料珍贵,发轫自冷战,现代化思维笼罩下的比较政治、政体分类和民主化操作学之最巅峰和最终曲。此后民主化研究突破”某阶段现代化与某政体配套“”民主可欲“之思路,方法上引入定量、博弈论、经济学视野等,着重细化观测和模型预测,宏大粗糙加分类定性不再有市场。以五个民主运转条件为基础:公民社会、法律法治、成熟政治社会、制度化经济社会和相对强力官僚机构,观测威权、极权、苏丹和后极权四种社会形态下民... 封面惊悚。经验材料珍贵,发轫自冷战,现代化思维笼罩下的比较政治、政体分类和民主化操作学之最巅峰和最终曲。此后民主化研究突破”某阶段现代化与某政体配套“”民主可欲“之思路,方法上引入定量、博弈论、经济学视野等,着重细化观测和模型预测,宏大粗糙加分类定性不再有市场。以五个民主运转条件为基础:公民社会、法律法治、成熟政治社会、制度化经济社会和相对强力官僚机构,观测威权、极权、苏丹和后极权四种社会形态下民主化的任务与挑战,且成功以后极权社会分类将新近转型的苏东包含进民主化研究中,为分类学迈出了最后一步。值得注意、两作者也自认重要的是提出民族认同与民族主义、政权合法性赋予、国家建设和民主化之关系问题,惜仅以如何鼓励巩固多元认同潦草带过,忽略了历史视角中当代民族国家建构与民主化同时进行之深刻艰难问题。 (展开)
2 有用 月亮脸 2020-06-22 10:08:20
Nondemocratic regime一章。上世纪comparativists:分类大法好
1 有用 follett 2009-04-07 20:00:23
linz爱用长句子,我慢!
1 有用 水草狗 2017-06-11 09:58:01
林茨强调非民主国家的体制特征会决定其民主化的道路与结果,带有新制度主义色彩。制约的条件包括国家性、公民社会、政治社会、法律、经济体制的制度化水平、科层能力。按照不同的条件分布分为四类,极权、后极权、威权、苏丹制。每一类有若干共性,内部又有具体差别。缺乏概括性的机制解释,失之繁琐。
0 有用 超人 2014-11-03 19:08:05
居然非常容易读,甚至超过度汉语的速度,很惊奇
0 有用 DavidSi 2023-10-25 05:58:55 美国
chapter 17 on “Hungary: A Negotiated Transition from Mature Post-Totalitarianism”
0 有用 王碗130 2023-10-01 11:47:54 上海
Chapter 3,我觉得可以打4.5星,post authoritarian总让我对号入座
0 有用 小博 2021-06-06 15:27:59
只看了第一章的理论框架部分,completed democratic transitions and consolidate democracies需要五个相互关联的场域来支撑:公民社会、政治社会(一整套政治架构)、依法、国家机关(国家能力)、经济社会(国家对经济社会保持适度干预),这个理论基本奠定了西方liberal democracy的理论基石。
2 有用 月亮脸 2020-06-22 10:08:20
Nondemocratic regime一章。上世纪comparativists:分类大法好
1 有用 水草狗 2017-06-11 09:58:01
林茨强调非民主国家的体制特征会决定其民主化的道路与结果,带有新制度主义色彩。制约的条件包括国家性、公民社会、政治社会、法律、经济体制的制度化水平、科层能力。按照不同的条件分布分为四类,极权、后极权、威权、苏丹制。每一类有若干共性,内部又有具体差别。缺乏概括性的机制解释,失之繁琐。