存在与时间性

The culture of a region is not fixed at a certain stage but built on time and groups. When we go into the field to do cultural anthropology research, we actually look upon the group culture from the separation of time, which means static studies. The view of associationism is to summarize it as impression. I think the impression here is our cultural profile. It should be noted that the impression seems to be isolated that is hard to build up a connection, while culture is undoubtedly not fractured. Therefore, if we assume that there is a witness of sequential relationship that is called diversity. Let such a concept that is beyond temporality decompose time into a number of non-time moments while ignore the universality and infinity of time to some extent. However, if we look upon time from the opposite side, we consider it as a "pure connection between internality and cohesion", while the continuity in a broad sense is contradictory to the fact that there is no order in identity, the extreme of internality and cohesion. I finally found rationality in Sartre's conclusion, which says consciousness has transcendence and self-consciousness that makes temporality internalized in the relationship of existence. Only through temporality can human beings realize the freedom and value "in the world". Only by looking upon temporality as a logical condition, consciousness, reality and existence are as a whole. Therefore, the structures of time and self are the same, that is, always outside oneself.