Chapter on TD—未读完，有待修改

在读Thomas Demand的chapter，Trodd’s thesis—centered on the discussion of a multilayered “interiority”—is based on arguing against Fried’s argument. Good that she is looking for an alternative interpretation, but she seems to disagree for the sake of disagreement… her re-construction/definition on interiority is too scatter and too far a stretch. Really disagree about the part where she deny the link between TD’s work with the external world. Of course, TD’s model is not really a representation of reality, but you just can’t deny its relevance to history/historical incidents, which again points its connection to a external world. 还没读完，但是希望读完可以被打脸