一些错译和漏译

终于有大把空闲时间了，来填个坑

P63正一『“我”便对应于自我』后漏译『in ‘full speech’ it corresponds to the subject;』试译『在“充实言语”中它对应于主体』。

P75正六『an actual object that has been lost and can be recovered』译为『一个实际丧失且无法找回的对象』，『无法』应为『可以』。

P106中间『Hamlet is unable to mourn the loss of the phallus that will inaugurate the movement of his own desire.』译为『哈姆雷特无法哀悼阳具的丧失，因为这个阳具将会开启他自身欲望的运动』，这是一个定从，没有明确因果关系，去掉『因为』。

下面引文『in the act of mourning it is the world which has become poor and empty; in melancholia it is the ego itself.』译为『在哀悼行为中，世界变得贫乏且空洞；而在抑郁中，世界则是自我本身』，后半句应为『而在抑郁中，自我变得贫乏且空洞』。（句末省略which has become poor and empty）

P122中间『如此以至于我们给它赋予了某种恒定性』后漏译『we retrospectively turn nothing into something』，试译『我们回溯性地将空无转化为某物』（参考《斜目而视》译法）。

P142第二段正三『just when we think we possess our object of desire–be that another person, a new possession or even a difficult idea we have been struggling to get hold of–we are still dissatisfied.』『be that』译为『亦即成为』，试译『无论它是』。

P147正二『被难以置信的理想化的人物』，『的』应为『地』。

P152正三『According to Althusser, Marxism and psychoanalysis converge upon a specific problematic, that is, a particular structure of mis-recognition. For Marxism, this is the mis-recognition that individuals make history; for psychoanalysis, it is the subjects’ mis-recognition of themselves as centred autonomous egos.』第二句前半段译为『对于马克思主义而言，正是这种误认使一些个体创造了历史』，试译『对于马克思主义而言，这是个体创造了历史的误认』。（that引导同位语从句）

第二段正四『Indeed, ideology is profoundly unconscious in the sense that it fails to work the moment we recognize it as ideological.』译为『实际上，意识形态是深层“无意识”的，因为从某种意义上说，它未能使我们将其承认作意识形态的那个时刻运转起来。』试译『的确，意识形态在如下意义上是深层“无意识”的：在我们将它识别为意识形态的时刻/在我们意识到它是意识形态的时刻，它便停止运作了。』（断句：it fails to work / the moment we recognize it as ideological，the moment引导时间状从）

P154正一『Žižek identifies this traumatic moment as the fundamental antagonism at the root of all societies.』译为『齐泽克则把这一创伤性时刻看作是根植在所有社会的基本“对立”之中。』试改为『齐泽克则把这一创伤性时刻看作是根植于所有社会的基本“对立”。』

中上『That ‘essence’ is the moment of barbarity, conflict and antagonism that must be repressed if a society is to claim legitimacy as a ‘natural’, peaceful and democratically evolving state.』译为『这个“本质”即是残暴、冲突与对抗的时刻，而一个社会假如要宣称合法性是一种“自然的”、和平的与民主发展的状态，那么这个本质就必须受到压抑。』if从句试改为『如果一个社会想要作为“自然的”、和平的与民主发展的国家宣称自己的合法性/获得合法性』。（claim和state的一词多义）

中下『As the symbolic network of the former communist ideology and Yugoslav state disintegrated, we were confronted with the social antagonism constitutive of new ‘democratic’ societies (see Žižek 1993: 200–37).』后半句译为『我们便面临着由那些新的“民主”社会所构成的社会对立。』试译『我们便面临着那些对新的“民主”社会来说起到构成性作用的社会对立。』

P157中间『The inherent instability of identity undermines traditional conceptions of political identity and solidarity, but also opens up the possibility for non-normative theories of subjectivity.』译为『这种同一性的内在不稳定性，不仅破坏了政治认同与团结的传统概念，而且还开启了那些有关主体性的非规范性理论的可能性。』『不仅……而且……』表递进关系，原文似乎是转折关系，试改为『这种同一性的内在不稳定性，破坏了政治认同与团结的传统概念，但也开启了那些有关主体性的非规范性理论的可能性。』

P166『Traditionally psychoanalysis has claimed the position of the master discourse, while literature is assigned the subordinate position as a set of texts in need of interpretation. For Felman, though, literature is not a separate discourse outside psychoanalysis, but since its inception–that is, Freud’s encounter with Sophocles’ Oedipus Rex–literature provides the language through which psychoanalysis can speak its concepts and its truths.』译为『在传统上，精神分析向来主张主人辞说的位置，而文学则把从属性的位置指派为一组需要诠释的文本。对费尔曼而言，尽管文学并非是超出精神分析之外的一种孤立的话语，但是自其开端以来……』试译『在传统上，精神分析向来获得/索取主人辞说的位置，而文学则作为一组需要诠释的文本被指派为/分配给从属性的位置。但是，对费尔曼而言，文学并非是超出精神分析之外的一种孤立的话语，而是自其开端以来……』（claim的一词多义；subordinate主被动混乱；两个逗号间的though表转折，且如果though译为尽管的话是不能和后面的but连用的，这个but应该是“not...but...”结构表示“不是...而是...”）

P173下段正六『recover』译为『重获新生』，考虑到疗养院的语境是不是简单译为『康复』就好（不过我没看过这电影，也可能就是重获新生，存疑）