If all politics is local, then so is almost everything else, argues sociologist Gary Alan Fine. We organize our lives by relying on those closest to us—family members, friends, work colleagues, team mates, and other intimates—to create meaning and order. In this thoughtful and wide-ranging book, Fine argues that the basic building blocks of society itself are forged within the boundaries of such small groups, the "tiny publics" necessary for a robust, functioning social order at all levels. Action, meaning, authority, inequality, organization, and institutions all have their roots in small groups. Yet for the past twenty-five years social scientists have tended to ignore the power of groups in favor of an emphasis on organizations, societies, or individuals. Based on over thirty-five years of Fine's own ethnographic research across an array of small groups, Tiny Publics presents a compelling new theory of the pivotal role of small groups in organizing social life. No social system can thrive without flourishing small groups. They provide havens in an impersonal world, where faceless organizations become humanized. Taking examples from such diverse worlds as Little League baseball teams, restaurant workers, high school debate teams, weather forecasters, and political volunteers, Fine demonstrates how each group has its own unique culture, or idioculture—the system of knowledge, beliefs, behavior, and customs that define and hold a group together. With their dense network of relationships, groups serve as important sources of social and cultural capital for their members. The apparently innocuous jokes, rituals, and nicknames prevalent within Little League baseball teams help establish how teams function internally and how they compete with other teams. Small groups also provide a platform for their members to engage in broader social discourse and a supportive environment to begin effecting change in larger institutions. In his studies of mushroom collectors and high school debate teams, Fine demonstrates the importance of stories that group members tell each other about their successes and frustrations in fostering a strong sense of social cohesion. And Fine shows how the personal commitment political volunteers bring to their efforts is reinforced by the close-knit nature of their work, which in turn has the power to change larger groups and institutions. In this way, the actions and debates begun in small groups can eventually radiate outward to affect every level of society. Fine convincingly demonstrates how small groups provide fertile ground for the seeds of civic engagement. Outcomes often attributed to large-scale social forces originate within such small-scale domains. Employing rich insights from both sociology and social psychology, as well as vivid examples from a revealing array of real-work groups, Tiny Publics provides a compelling examination of the importance of small groups and of the rich vitality they bring to social life.
5 有用 鄙德 2020-12-25 18:17:41
Fine厉害的地方有两个,一是做了几十年的民族志研究,从棒球队到龙与地下城的桌游玩家到厨师、气象家、民间艺术家。二是他保持了高度的理论延续性,这些经验研究总归都被他放在了一个以小群体为核心的社会学,以至于他1979年的关于小群体的文化创造的论文呢都能被归纳进这本书中。(为了改论文看的,读了部分章节,虽然总会觉得他的理论解释并没有那种惊为天人的感觉,但还是特别令人敬佩,是个自己特别享受自己研究的学者... Fine厉害的地方有两个,一是做了几十年的民族志研究,从棒球队到龙与地下城的桌游玩家到厨师、气象家、民间艺术家。二是他保持了高度的理论延续性,这些经验研究总归都被他放在了一个以小群体为核心的社会学,以至于他1979年的关于小群体的文化创造的论文呢都能被归纳进这本书中。(为了改论文看的,读了部分章节,虽然总会觉得他的理论解释并没有那种惊为天人的感觉,但还是特别令人敬佩,是个自己特别享受自己研究的学者。) (展开)
2 有用 三木 2015-03-30 16:15:46
翻过,作者一生做的几个田野案例综合分析: 文化与行动,小群体,local sociology, groups, action, norms, constraints and exteriority, ideology
0 有用 angry crane 2024-02-11 14:54:23 山西
2023fall readings. 综合了70S以来对于small groups 的各项研究(9个主要+2较小的调查),提出sociological miniaturism (ASR 2001), 强调microstructure 形成于interaction order(来自Goffman)。 不算非常闪亮的研究,但很干净漂亮,很喜欢这种从真菌学会DnD棒球队等等中抽象出来的能力。最有印象的其... 2023fall readings. 综合了70S以来对于small groups 的各项研究(9个主要+2较小的调查),提出sociological miniaturism (ASR 2001), 强调microstructure 形成于interaction order(来自Goffman)。 不算非常闪亮的研究,但很干净漂亮,很喜欢这种从真菌学会DnD棒球队等等中抽象出来的能力。最有印象的其实是Fine对DnD(在另一本Shared Fantasy中)的研究lol (展开)
0 有用 一球妹妹 2019-04-19 15:15:43
此书惊为天人!
0 有用 成不成 2021-09-30 22:01:40
选读。以“小群体”勾连微观与宏观,解释稍嫌刻板。