作者:
Pierre Bourdieu 出版社: Stanford University Press 原作名: Le sens pratique 译者:
Richard Nice 出版年: 1992-8-1 页数: 333 定价: USD 27.95 装帧: Paperback ISBN: 9780804720113
Our usual representations of the opposition between the "civilized" and the "primitive" derive from willfully ignoring the relationship of distance our social science sets up between the observer and the observed. In fact, the author argues, the relationship between the anthropologist and his object of study is a particular instance of the relationship between knowing and doing...
Our usual representations of the opposition between the "civilized" and the "primitive" derive from willfully ignoring the relationship of distance our social science sets up between the observer and the observed. In fact, the author argues, the relationship between the anthropologist and his object of study is a particular instance of the relationship between knowing and doing, interpreting and using, symbolic mastery and practical mastery--or between logical logic, armed with all the accumulated instruments of objectification, and the universally pre-logical logic of practice. In this, his fullest statement of a theory of practice, Bourdieu both sets out what might be involved in incorporating one's own standpoint into an investigation and develops his understanding of the powers inherent in the second member of many oppositional pairs--that is, he explicates how the practical concerns of daily life condition the transmission and functioning of social or cultural forms. The first part of the book, "Critique of Theoretical Reason," covers more general questions, such as the objectivization of the generic relationship between social scientific observers and their objects of study, the need to overcome the gulf between subjectivism and objectivism, the interplay between structure and practice (a phenomenon Bourdieu describes via his concept of the "habitus), the place of the body, the manipulation of time, varieties of symbolic capital, and modes of domination. The second part of the book, "Practical Logics," develops detailed case studies based on Bourdieu's ethnographic fieldwork in Algeria. These examples touch on kinship patterns, the social construction of domestic space, social categories of perception and classification, and ritualized actions and exchanges. This book develops in full detail the theoretical positions sketched in Bourdieu's "Outline of a Theory of Practice. It will be especially useful to readers seeking to grasp the subtle concepts central to Bourdieu's theory, to theorists interested in his points of departure from structuralism (especially fom Levi-Strauss), and to critics eager to understand what role his theory gives to human agency. It also reveals Bourdieu to be an anthropological theorist of considerable originality and power.
习性是持久地配备了有规则即兴之作的生成动力，作为实践感（ sens pratique），它使制度中的客观化意义（ sens objective）恢复活カ。集体历史的产品，亦即客观结构，若要以持久的和调适的行为倾向客观结构的运行条件这一形式再生成，就离不开反复灌输和据为己有这样的工作，而习性就是这种工作的产品，它形成于一种特殊的历史，将它的特殊逻辑施加于身体化（ Incorporation），行为人则通过这种身体化使自己从属于制度中客观化了的历史。故此，习性能使行为人生活于制度之中，在实践中占有制度，从而使制度保持活力、生机和效力，不断地使它们摆脱无效和衰竭状态，通过方法是使得被弃于其中的意义复活，方法是对制度加以修正和改变，因为修正和改变是重新活化之社偿和条件。习性更是制度借以得到充分实现的东西：身体化能发挥身体的本领，认真对待以言行事的社会魔法，其功效能使国王、银行家和教士成为人格化的世袭君主政体、金融资本主义或教会。物占有其所有者化为个生成结构，生成种种完全符合其逻辑和要求的实践活动。（P81） (查看原文)
读布迪厄的《实践感》时倒是找到了一点久违的对理论进展的期待。布迪厄对habitus和champ的叙述一直让我想起分析哲学在intentionality和和生活世界方面的争议。我当然会更倾向于维特根斯坦式的立场：不存在intention（不存在habitus）。intend to do是个伪命题，因为根本不存在...
(展开)
![[法国] 皮埃尔·布尔迪厄](https://img2.doubanio.com/img/author/medium/public/1495692990.41.jpg)
皮埃尔·布尔迪厄 作者
.
译林出版社2003版
Jargvci
译林出版社2012版
汪杨
译林出版社2003版
Jaryang
译林出版社2012版
2 有用 秋江暝泊 2015-01-10 01:54:32
前五章。比两年前体会更深了一些。场域形塑了惯习的各种机会和可能性，惯习有无限的选择但又是场域的产物。同一个阶级有class habitus和class experience。场域会embody在个人身上。进入场域之前默认接受了这一套规则——为什么这些东西会是有用的？布迪厄的人类学语言学背景让人去反思使用范畴和问问题的前提，但他得益于马克思的地方又让他坚持物质基础的基底性。说布迪厄是“其实有两层”，... 前五章。比两年前体会更深了一些。场域形塑了惯习的各种机会和可能性，惯习有无限的选择但又是场域的产物。同一个阶级有class habitus和class experience。场域会embody在个人身上。进入场域之前默认接受了这一套规则——为什么这些东西会是有用的？布迪厄的人类学语言学背景让人去反思使用范畴和问问题的前提，但他得益于马克思的地方又让他坚持物质基础的基底性。说布迪厄是“其实有两层”，经济的一层符号的一层两层搅在一起可能是更加恰当的。也许有了文化的sense之后方能更好地理解布迪厄。 (展开)
0 有用 电胆马 2023-02-27 00:11:34 中国香港
chapters 3-4, pp. 52- 79
0 有用 王八羔子 2018-10-25 09:41:08
一刷。
0 有用 村头米 2009-07-16 05:19:28
难懂那是一定的！
0 有用 焉能淩风飞 2017-10-08 05:49:52
现象学在社会语境中的表达
0 有用 水草肃 2024-05-06 07:17:58 英国
此生和Bourdieu无法和解……
0 有用 = = 2023-09-05 13:50:37 北京
读了第一部分。人类学分析部分看的实践理论大纲部分。
0 有用 越洋鲫鱼 2023-03-21 03:34:22 美国
这书和中级微观经济学原理到底有多大差别
0 有用 电胆马 2023-02-27 00:11:34 中国香港
chapters 3-4, pp. 52- 79
0 有用 丁白 2022-12-20 18:37:24 北京
writing style太糟糕了…高中读时，完全想象不到有人会写这么长的句子（讨论strategic action的部分记忆犹新）。实践感的神经/心理机制还是值得关注的，一些对内隐/程序性记忆的研究与此说的是一回事儿