作者:
Andrew Gelman
/
John B. Carlin
/
Hal S. Stern
/
Donald B. Rubin
出版社: Chapman and Hall/CRC
出版年: 2003-7-29
页数: 690
定价: USD 83.95
装帧: Hardcover
丛书: Texts in Statistical Science
ISBN: 9781584883883
出版社: Chapman and Hall/CRC
出版年: 2003-7-29
页数: 690
定价: USD 83.95
装帧: Hardcover
丛书: Texts in Statistical Science
ISBN: 9781584883883
这本书的其他版本 · · · · · · ( 全部5 )
在哪儿借这本书 · · · · · ·
以下书单推荐 · · · · · · ( 全部 )
- data science (雪地里的水煮蛋)
- Probability and Statistics (疯凰)
- Information Science (xiaojun)
- 贝叶斯分析 (Yingfeng)
- 不作就不会死系列 (ʕ^ᴥ^ʔ)
谁读这本书? · · · · · ·
二手市场
· · · · · ·
- 在豆瓣转让 有193人想读,手里有一本闲着?
订阅关于Bayesian Data Analysis, Second Edition的评论:
feed: rss 2.0
5 有用 Mo 2013-01-21 18:12:39
不咋地,既没没理论深度,又不系统。既没覆盖足够多的有用算法,废话还多。neither theoretical enough to give deep insight, nor practical and broad enough to cover most useful tools and algorithms. Why it is so famous, always bugs me. Maybe... 不咋地,既没没理论深度,又不系统。既没覆盖足够多的有用算法,废话还多。neither theoretical enough to give deep insight, nor practical and broad enough to cover most useful tools and algorithms. Why it is so famous, always bugs me. Maybe because the author is a much better salesman than a researcher. If you want to know Bayesian, get a real classic, like James O. Berger. (展开)
0 有用 🐧 2018-07-20 09:30:49
Devil, 深度讲得很尴尬,作为应用型,讲得太理论,作为理论型,讲得太浅薄
2 有用 blackkss 2018-02-05 22:45:51
It must be read if you wish to be a Bayesian
0 有用 春秋晦朔 2021-02-25 04:46:30
理论稍微有些多,应用不足。
0 有用 春秋晦朔 2021-02-25 04:46:30
理论稍微有些多,应用不足。
0 有用 🐧 2018-07-20 09:30:49
Devil, 深度讲得很尴尬,作为应用型,讲得太理论,作为理论型,讲得太浅薄
2 有用 blackkss 2018-02-05 22:45:51
It must be read if you wish to be a Bayesian
5 有用 Mo 2013-01-21 18:12:39
不咋地,既没没理论深度,又不系统。既没覆盖足够多的有用算法,废话还多。neither theoretical enough to give deep insight, nor practical and broad enough to cover most useful tools and algorithms. Why it is so famous, always bugs me. Maybe... 不咋地,既没没理论深度,又不系统。既没覆盖足够多的有用算法,废话还多。neither theoretical enough to give deep insight, nor practical and broad enough to cover most useful tools and algorithms. Why it is so famous, always bugs me. Maybe because the author is a much better salesman than a researcher. If you want to know Bayesian, get a real classic, like James O. Berger. (展开)